CRN

By Barry Secrest

Obama’s cornerstone administration achievement, so says the White House, is the soon to be voted upon Trans-Pacific partnership, which Sen. Jeff Sessions has described as “some Sort of One-Unified Government Structure.”

What the White House isn’t saying is how the TPP will seek to roll-up some of the largest western trading partners into a pact which is less about trade than it is about abolishing US sovereignty in favor of a centralized ruling tribunal run by a small number of international oligarchs, probably located in Europe.

Sessions went on to describe the deal as a “breathtaking erosion of US sovereignty.”

However, it’s not just one of the most knowledgeable Conservatives in the Senate, but it’s also billionaire businessman and leading presidential candidate Donald Trump, who referred to the TPP as “a bad, bad, deal for American businesses, for workers, and for taxpayers; Trump went on to state “it’s a huge set of handouts for a few insiders that don’t even care about our great, great America.”

Trump continued that “Congress has to stand-up to defeat this raw power grab–with a dismal Obama track record, why should a Republican Congress give him [Obama] more power and gut the Constitution to do it?”  "It’s just crazy!”

Moreover, now, since the White House has been finally pressured into releasing the full text of the trade pact, additional and perhaps even more damaging information, is coming to light.

Specifically, the TPP is nothing more than a multi-national agreement which will serve as the architecture for a global “one-world” network of laws and regulations.

This, will, inevitably, lead to highly-regulated, globally governed trade predicated upon internationally mandated civil overreaching, infringing upon, and in many cases, actually overriding the US Constitution.

No one outside of Big Corp lobbyists and sworn-to-secrecy Congressmen, had even been allowed to read and completely disclose what was in this devil’s pact trade bill, prior to its being released, but, now there are even more problems.

Specifically, CNS news is now reporting the fact that the Obamatrade preamble actually recognizes state-owned enterprises, which are officially recognized Communist constructs– as legitimate, and even endorses these state-owned enterprises within the TPP.

The problems with a fascist foreign taxpayer subsidized enterprise, while obviously difficult for a private enterprise to compete with, will also contain advantages that may eventually seek to further unbalance trade, requiring even more government involvement, by all partners involved.

The trade pact further seeks to deepen the US within a pending 10 region super-trade pact subject to the dictates of a formidably empowered central tribunal, which could economically override individual national authority. It could, in fact, be the beginning of a centralized tribunal authority with powers that could essentially dwarf any international construct seen, to date.

As disturbing as this may seem, the agreement also seeks to add the limitations of the climate change agenda, the UN’s agenda 21, and even (the Pope approved) Agenda-30, into the dictates of the agreement’s core, a thing that could prove well beyond unsettling, once the details of the trade agreement as enmeshed with these other international dictates, has been fully understood.

above is a page capture of the TPP preamble

Excerpts from the story from CNS News, follows:

“The TPP’s 509-word “Preamble”—which has been posted online by the office of the U.S. Trade Representative under the heading “Made in America”—begins by stating:

“The Parties to this Agreement, resolving to ESTABLISH a comprehensive regional agreement that promotes economic integration to liberalise trade and investment, bring economic growth and social benefits, create new opportunities for workers and businesses, contribute to raising living standards, benefit consumers, reduce poverty and promote sustainable growth…”

It goes on to say:

“AFFIRM that state-owned enterprises can play a legitimate role in the diverse economies of the Parties, while recognising that the provision of unfair advantages to state-owned enterprises undermines fair and open trade and investment, and resolve to establish rules for state-owned enterprises that promote a level playing field with privately owned businesses, transparency and sound business practices.”

Read full article