February 20th, 2017
The anti-American Muslim world must be wildly celebrating over this bit of chillingly prescient conduct in the heart of Manhatten, where, the Muslim call to prayer could be heard blaring out amongst liberal supporters of Islamics, who gathered to collectively dislike President Trump.
By Barry Secrest
Former president Obama referred to it as one of the "most beautiful sounds in the world," however, most non-Muslim Americans hear it as an invasively chilling chant sounded by a cult that has officially outlawed music.
It's referred to as "The Muslim Call to Prayer" and the sound of it rang out only a few blocks from the 9/11 terror attacks that took over 3500 lives, in the name of Islam and its god.
This photo caption is from an Islamic fundamentalist Website
While much has been made of it by an Islamic-adoring media, the UK Daily Mail reports that only about 1,000 people showed up to declare solidarity against Trump and perhaps his supporters as well.
From The Daily Mail:
"About 1,000 people of different ethnicity and faith attended the demonstration, called 'Today, I Am A Muslim Too,' in Times Square, Manhattan.
Simmons, who previously said he has not spoken to Trump since 2015, cheekily told the crowd: 'We are here, unified, because of Donald Trump, so we won’t speak too harshly of him tonight – today.
'We want to thank him for bringing us together,' Fox News reported."
Meanwhile, the Associated Press filed this report:
"More than a thousand people of various faiths rallied in New York City in support of Muslim Americans and to protest President Donald Trump's immigration policies.
The "I Am A Muslim Too" rally was held in Times Square on Sunday and was organized by several groups, including the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding.
The protesters waved American flags, held signs saying "No Muslim Ban," and chanted "We are One."
"Mayor Bill de Blasio spoke at the peaceful rally, saying "we have to dispel the stereotypes" and that America is "a country founded to protect all faiths and all beliefs."
Hip-Hop mogul Russell Simmons headlined the rally. He said the Muslim community was being used as a scapegoat, but that "diversity will prevail."
However, what most of the people in attendance don't know about Islam, in their quasi-innocent gathering, is the certainty that at least one hidden truth about Islam speaks to the fact that Muslims are forbidden to take either Christians or Jews as friends.
Politifact, which tried to debunk this particular factoid, was unable to do so, due to the following translations of Quran verse 5:51, which all read as follows (while each ends up at the same factual destination):
" Quranic Arabic Corpus, a website that allows users to select passages from the Koran and compare parallel translations, offers several English translations of verse 5:51. Here are a few we found:
Saheeh International: "O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are (in fact) allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you -- then indeed, he is (one) of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people."
Arberry: "O believers, take not Jews and Christians as friends; they are friends of each other. Whoso of you makes them his friends is one of them. God guides not the people of the evildoers."
The Noble Qur'an: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers and unjust)."
The Message of The Quran says: "O you who have attained to faith! Do not take the Jews and Christians for your allies: they are but allies of one another -- and whoever of you allies himself with them becomes, verily, one of them; behold, God does not guide such evildoers."
Despite the fact that many progressives, Islamics, and interfaith respondents, have all tried to twist the meaning of this particular verse into something else altogether, this reading, among many others, and some even far worse, represent the undiscovered truth about Islam & the west.
So, while the protesting gatherers may have exhibited at least what they thought might be some bit of good intent, the truth points more towards a wavering anti-Trump movement sparked by George Soros-led pro-Islamic apologists, otherwise known as the Democrat party.
The simple fact remains, in much of the western world, that most have been painfully misled about the truth regarding the cult of Islam, and by grand design.
February 20th, 2017
By Barry Secrest
Following Donald Trump's recent press conference in calling out the mainstream leftist-advocate media, watch Deputy Assistant National Security Advisor Sebastian Gorka literally take the Progressive BBC to task while simultaneously taking Newsnight BBC anchor Evan Davis, completely apart.
The unusually brilliant Gorka, an anti-Islamist expert, continuously bent Davis' often ridiculous lines of left-stream activist questioning, right back upon the anchor for positing "fake news," in this often withering but highly entertaining extended interview.
Evan Davis, during his semi-hostile "Gotcha" interview with Gorka, was most obviously punching well over his admitted cerebral weight class, and it clearly did not go very well for him, at all.
February 19th, 2017
CNN anchor Don Lemon, it's being reported, actually walked off the set after being accused of running a fake news, anti-Trump, story in real-time on network TV.
Although, he may merely have been, alternatively, sucked up by one of those pesky black holes; a thing by which Lemon is an unadjudicated expert, apparently....
By Barry Secrest
While almost all Americans are now fully aware of the extreme left-wing bias regarding the entire US traditional media, many still cannot fully comprehend the extraordinary breadth and depth of the official disconnect between the American people and its historical media, that's been at work for the past 15 years.
It's as if America's entire media has been co-opted by some foreign impresario whose completely hostile to traditional American values.
While President Trump has continually alluded to this increasingly bizarre configuration; instead of backing off, the media has now effectively doubled down on its aggressive stance towards all things largely considered beneficial to the nation as a whole, and with extreme magnitude, as it regards the new president.
But, now, concerning media bias, most Americans can easily identify the hypocrisy at play, especially in the timbre of the stories that, while previously acting in the defense of the US executive branch, has suddenly turned on a dime and begun a continual and insistent Battle Line of attack against the US presidency.
The latest example, out of far too many, came from one of Trump's frequent targets, in reference to the well-deserved moniker of "Fake News."
Specifically, CNN news anchor Don Lemon ran a story on what was characterized as the extreme cost of guarding President Trump on his trips away from the White House, despite the fact that Trump has only been in office for less than a month and has yet to actually take a vacation.
The interesting thing, regarding this particular story, might be the fact that according to our vast internet searches, we could find no CNN News broadcast, ever, concerning the extreme costs of Obama's humongous travel costs, over the entire last eight years.
So, it's less than 30 days versus an entire 8 years?
Even worse, might be the fact that the costs that Obama rang up, in his vast taxpayer sponsored travelogue, were some of the most elaborate ever recorded, in US presidential history.
All of this, also, despite the fact that Michelle Obama's dispensation for taking a separate jet whenever accompanying Obama, on almost any presidential trip, became one of her most notorious calling cards, even to the point of calling into question the Obama's marital relationship.
But, it didn't end there; other areas of the media were rife with stories regarding the exorbitant costs charged to the American people, over the many and varied separate Obama sojourns, including even official state trips, and most especially, Michelle's legendary vacations.
Moreover, it should be disclosed, that CNN News Network, not the broadcast affiliate, did run at least one story on the costs rung up by the Obama's on an Asian trip undertaken in 2010.
In that specific article, CNN Heroically defended President Obama stating that the entire ruckus about Obama's extravagant Asian trip "doesn't appear to hold water."
In fact, the headline of the article. from CNN, regarding repeated attacks on the left-Wing president by other members of the media on the Obama's travel cost, sought to allay all suspicions by "Debunking the Myth" of Obama's vacation expenses.
Now, isn't that special?
February 18th, 2017
By Barry Secrest
The Associated Press earlier today, published a sensational "Fake News" story regarding a leaked White House memo on immigration enforcement.
The memo, concerning the speculative utilization of the National Guard for guarding the border from illegals, had been thrown out and never officially considered, however, the truth of the memo, as speculative only, had not been published by the AP.
Moreover, the AP never retracted its fake news story, which is now roiling immigration snowflakes into a frenzy.
But there's far more to this story; according to Town Hall:
"Early Friday morning, the Associated Press reported on a memo they claimed shows Trump administration plans to use thousands of National Guard troops to round up illegal immigrants in cities across the country.
The White House immediately denied the accusation, calling it 100 percent false. Eventually, AP and Reuters amended their stories, still not fully reflecting context of the memo in question.
Regardless, as of 3:31 p.m. ET on Friday the fake news is still trending as the top story on Facebook. Just yesterday, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg discussed the problem of fake news at length on his Facebook page."
However, the real story, here, is how the media has treated a theoretical measure that was completely rejected by the Trump White House but was much earlier put into full effect by not only the Bush regime but also, the Obama regime.
Indeed, the highly revered if not mainstream media-worshiped Obama regime, in a story published by McClatchy News, was the US administration that most recently put into effect the use of the National Guard for the purpose of guarding and controlling the southern US border, from illegal alien incursions.
The operative point, in this case, being that the Obama regime utilized the US National Guard for border control before Obama's re-election in 2012. After Obama's re-election, the border was essentially flung wide open for any and all to enter.
Here's the McClatchy story:
"In 2010, former President Barack Obama said he would deploy 1,200 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border. They were sent to Arizona, Texas, California and New Mexico. While National Guard troops were not authorized to arrest people found to be crossing the border illegally, they helped staff observation posts, monitor surveillance footage and build fences.
In 2006, former President George W. Bush called up 6,000 National Guard troops to California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. They were commissioned to help install border barriers, provide training and assist with border surveillance. The deployment was designed to support Customs and Border Protection agents in “executing logistical and administrative support, operating detection systems, providing mobile communications, augmenting border-related intelligence analysis efforts, and building and installing border security infrastructure.” Operation Jump Start, as the project was called, hoped to relieve Border Patrol agents from administrative duties so they could instead focus on border security.
According to Customs and Border Protection, the operation resulted in the apprehension of 5,003 people, 110 vehicles, $11,052, 28,577 pounds of marijuana and 1,447 pounds of cocaine.
Trump campaigned on a platform of tough immigration enforcement and increased border security, including the construction of a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. While initially indicating he wanted to deport all of the estimated 11 million people in the country without proper documentation, the president said he’d first focus on people with criminal records. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been conducting a series of raids across the country rounding up people they believe are in the country illegally. ICE last week took 683 people into custody, the government said, which is stoking fears among immigrant communities."
February 13th, 2017
By Barry Secrest
It’s one of the major keystones of evangelical eschatology, the study of end of days prophecies.
“Transhumanism,” which encompasses the science of merging man with machine, has been a hot-button item in prophetical circles for at least the last decade. The ever-expanding commentary on numerous end of days prophecies, from both the Old and New Testaments, the Koran, and many other alternative sources, has fueled an explosion of websites, and even movies, across the planet.
The merger of man and machine has long been a popular science fiction subject, ranging from the $ 6 million dollar (bionic) man of the late seventies to the still-popular “Terminator” series, which has made billions at the box office, over a score of years.
But, now, as with almost all things being offered up, initially, as science fiction, transhumanism is quickly becoming an actual field of extensive scientific study, and in some cases, scientific fact.
The latest end times epiphany, at least in the prophetic domain, comes from controversial atheist billionaire and technogeek, Elon Musk, who asserts that in order to fend off irrelevance, mankind will, at some future point, need to merge with machines or suffer the extreme consequences
According to NBC news, Musk had this to say regarding the burgeoning transhumanist agenda:
“Billionaire Elon Musk is known for his futuristic ideas and his latest suggestion might just save us from being irrelevant as artificial intelligence (AI) grows more prominent.
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO said on Monday that humans need to merge with machines to become a sort of cyborg.
“Over time I think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence,” Musk told an audience at the World Government Summit in Dubai, where he also launched Tesla in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Musk explained what he meant by saying that computers can communicate at “a trillion bits per second", while humans, whose main communication method is typing with their fingers via a mobile device, can do about 10 bits per second. In an age when AI threatens to become widespread, humans would be useless, so there’s a need to merge with machines, according to Musk.”
However, as alluded to a little earlier, according to one prophetical website, Sign Post of the Times, the transhumanist agenda will mark a turning point for mankind which will inevitably launch a series of inescapable & cataclysmic events, as referenced in numerous religious texts:
“One of the prophetic signs we look at with great interest and which convinces us that time is very short is the race towards recreating humankind with both genetic manipulation and machine/human integration.
This drive to recreate human beings to that of Humanity 2.0, (Transhumanism), is what many call the Days of Noah revived and of which God will call to and end before the Transhumanists achieve their goals.
But, according to Musk, if humanity doesn’t merge with its own technology, then the machines that mankind has created to serve itself, will become a more relevant sub-species than mankind, which points to a rather self-defeating premise, at least on the face of it.
However, this particular facet of new age techno-think seems to also bring up even more avenues of end times study which directly alludes to the premise of human populations being pruned, or even exterminated to the tune of billions, in order to save both the planet and its limited resources, say the eco-Marxists.
This line of thinking also Segways neatly into the New World Order’s climate change hoax, which asserts, at least hypothetically, that a scaling back of industry, worldwide, is now necessary in order to for both man and the planet, to ultimately survive.
Musk reasons out his transhumanist agenda, in this way, according, again, to NBC News:
“Some high bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem,” Musk explained. The technologists’ proposal would see a new layer of a brain able to access information quickly and tap into artificial intelligence.
It’s not the first time Musk has spoken about the need for humans to evolve, but it’s a constant theme of his talks on how society can deal with the disruptive threat of AI. ‘Very quick’ disruption During his talk, Musk touched upon his fear of “deep AI” which goes beyond driverless cars to what he called “artificial general intelligence".
This he described as AI that is “smarter than the smartest human on earth” and called it a “dangerous situation".
“Transhumanism, he states, is “a strange liberation movement” whose “crusaders aim much higher than civil rights campaigners, feminists, or gay-rights advocates.” This movement, he says, wants “nothing less than to liberate the human race from its biological constraints.”
“The ultimate question raised by biotechnology is, What will happen to political rights once we are able to, in effect, breed some people with saddles on their backs, and others with boots and spurs?
What should we do in response to biotechnology that in the future will mix great potential benefits with threats that are either physical and obvious or spiritual and subtle? The answer is obvious: We should use the power of the state to regulate it.
Human nature shapes and constrains the possible kinds of political regimes, so a technology powerful enough to reshape what we are, will have possibly malign consequences for liberal democracy and the nature of politics itself.
While there were significant disputes over what human nature was, no one contested its importance as a basis for rights and justice. Among the believers in natural right were the American Founding Fathers, who based their revolution against the British crown on it. Nonetheless, the concept has been out of favor for the past century or two among academic philosophers and intellectuals.”
So, while Fukuyama, long ago, hit the nail on the head, it seems, the globalist technobureaucracy that’s exploding across the planet appears to be seeking a movement away from liberal democracy and more towards a form of totalitarian fascism, and transhumanism may be just the vehicle they need, to make it happen.
According to the late author Milton Cooper, a former government operative who wrote the quickly becoming prophetic book, “Behold A Pale Horse,” this new realignment or Order is powerfully real and may even now be coming into full fruition.
Cooper indicated before he died in a hail of law enforcement bullets, that “Their goal is to rule the world. The doctrine of this group is not democracy or communism but is a form of fascism.
So, what better way to introduce The New World Order, than by throwing the wrench of transhumanism, into the mix, thereby effectively handicapping natural rights, as we understand them, leading the world into a new matrix of reality.
“The Illuminati are not Communists, but some Communists are Illuminati. (1) Monarchism (thesis) faced democracy (antithesis) in WWI, which resulted in the formation of communism and the League of Nations (synthesis). (2) Democracy and communism (thesis) faced fascism (antithesis) in WWII and resulted in a more powerful United Nations (synthesis). (3) Capitalism (thesis) now faces communism (antithesis) and the result will be the New World Order, totalitarian socialism (synthesis).”