December 4th, 2016
By Barry Secrest
The Mainstream media and America's core leftists recently went into histrionics while simultaneously being frightened witless, after Trump's having apparently offended globalist-oriented Communist China by enjoying a phone conversation with Taiwan's leader over his recent presidential victory.
Trump held a phone conversation with Taiwan's President, which prompted the media to plunge into a scared sort of neurotic state of fear, merely due to the mainstream media's terror that America may have offended China.
Trump, it seems, broke some sort of bizarre protocol most likely engineered by a US State Department that's renowned for its historical lack of testicular fortitude in addition to a now infamous underuse of its secure data servers.
...at least not anymore....
To this, one of America's most senior foreign policy experts and former UN ambassador, John Bolton, who's also a candidate for US Secretary of State, indicated, "It's ridiculous to think that [Trump's] phone call upsets decades of anything." "But, I do think it's important that people understand that the President of the US should talk to anyone he wants if he thinks it's in the interests of the US."
Bolton then added, "And nobody in Beijing gets to dictate who we talk to."
Bolton continued, "My view has been for some time that we should be upgrading our relations with Taiwan, and I know that's going to cause heartburn in Beijing but it's a reality."
"This is a nation of over 20 million people, they have a democratic government, a free press, a free market, they meet all the customary international law definitions of statehood, so when a democratically elected leader calls the US, I say you bet he takes the call"
A One-Way Relationship
When questioned on the histrionics of the Left's reaction, Bolton had this to say, "Honestly, I think we should shake this relationship up, For the past several years , China has made aggressive, I would say, belligerent claims in the South China Sea." Bolton continued, "they've declared it to be a Chinese province, they've established a provincial capital, and what that means is they've taken a vast amount of water out of being international waters and making it into Chinese territorial waters."
In fact, China's cruel but still comical oligarchs suddenly got so worried, about Trump's call with Taiwan, that they actually filed a complaint through the US foreign ministry over Trump's insolence, even while China has repeatedly threatened war on the US, after the Chinese illegally annexed an entire international sea route in the South China sea.
Indeed, when it comes to international political relations, China, more often than not, reacts like a precocious child with a severe learning disability at best or perhaps a spoiled but spastic toddler at worst, due to the fact that its leaders are forever shielded within a Communist bubble that protects them from political reality.
Disguised: China's execution van looks like a normal police vehicle
For example, if any of their political subjects take issue with them or their political dictates, there's always a mobile execution squad available to swat the offending citizen-minion out of existence, a thing that progressives here in America can only fantasize about despite the slow-to-sink-in fact that their political domination of America has all but evaporated, ironically.
Adding sauce to the gander was the fact that in April of 2016, Chinese Minister Lou Jiwei called Donald Trump an “irrational type” and stated that the U.S. “wouldn’t be entitled to world leadership” if it followed Mr. Trump’s proposed trade policies towards China.
As if China calls the shots on all things global?
Twitter also heated up with millions of cowering leftists who've been programmed to react in fear in response to any type of national move that threatens the status quo of foreign countries who can actually militarily threaten the US.
This, unlike Obama's Hillary-oriented takedown of Libya, a country which lacks any sort of potential to strike the US. In fact, the left of America cheered when Obama militarily pummeled the nation of Libya into falling & then indirectly murdered its leader, Libyan President Muammar Qadafi, which seems to speak to the often subtle bullying mindset of America's leftist proletariat class.
Hillary Clinton, when questioned on Libya, states in raucous laughter "We came, we saw, he died" of Qadaffi, a thing which many people find well beyond morbidly disturbing, to watch, and then some, especially if anyone actually witnessed Qadaffi's death.
Bullies, you see, rarely to never threaten those who can hit back.
Moreover, the act of war on Libya, from their would-be fly-king, in Obama, at the behest of European globalists and Clinton, suddenly became a cause célèbre rather than the Left's usual preoccupation of inserting daisies into the business end of gun barrels; what's up with that anyway?
But then, also, there's that thing about Obama stating he would talk to anybody anytime and then making good on it by immediately engaging all of America's worst 2nd and 3rd-world terrorist-supporting enemies, while largely ignoring our allies.
Authoritarians-R-US and Better You Need Like it
But, aside from the Chinese leadership's ongoing bout of engendering endlessly incipient illusions of narcissistic grandeur, there are numerous other diplomatic extremes that the US media has all but ignored.
Remember also, the countless times during the 2016 election when Chinese communist leaders insistently warned the American people not to vote for Trump?
That evolution was borne more out of fear and arrogance than bold swagger, however, ruling from a bubble of illusory supremacy does have its drawbacks, in that China failed to recognize that America does not think like its soon-to-be evicted, cowardly, political rulers.
Then there are those of the Ignotariat class who misbelieve that China is America's number one trading partner, when it fact, it's the other way around, in that America is indeed, China's number one trading partner, but not the reverse.
While America is China's numero uno largest export nation,and with a bullet, China is not even close to being America's best export customer which then begs the question, what happened to the customer's always right?
That particular distinction, in fact, belongs to Canada, which is then followed by the EU, and then Mexico.
So, China, truth be told, ranks a distant fourth in American exports which then begs the next question, if America is China's number-one destination in exports and China is ranked fourth in US exports, doesn't somebody have some 'splaining to do, regarding the massive us trade imbalance with China and their well beyond belligerent stance on all things America?
Okay, true-dat. but, on the other hand, who is China's number one importer?
That would be the EU (which America defends) followed by Japan (which America defends) then South Korea (Which America also defends), then Taiwan (which America pretends to defend) and then finally, America (which America doesn't defend)
But, then, why is America expected to largely ignore Taiwan in deference to China?
Well, that was started via a policy begun in 1979 when the Soviets split with China, and while the Soviets were still a Communist nation under US President...... wait for it... Jimmy Carter, and need we say more?
Yeah, he gave away the Panama Canal, too....
Since that time we've been pursuing that particularly odd line of reasoning despite all of the international changes that have taken place-- effectively supplanting the need to worry over a nation like China that needs us far more than we need it--but pretends, albeit successfully-- in the reverse, and continually gets away with it only because our leaders are witlessly stupid and even cowardly to boot.
Now, America's entire government pretty much stumbles around under that age-old neanderthalean policy without ever truly asking the why's of it--(it's kind of like wearing neckties--nobody asks why we do it-- we just do it-- even though we don't ever really want to)
Things starting to make a little more sense now?
Point being, within all of this not only is China not even close to being America's top customer, China is also not the world's sole superpower, that role still belongs to America. Moreover, the US finally has a leader that won't be bullied by a bunch of Maoist tin hat dictators who obnoxiously insult Americans while simultaneously getting wealthy on our dime...
Remember, America's colors do not run.... China will no longer dictate either who America talks to or what America does, period, not with America's first modern-day anti-globalist, America-First President, Donald Trump in office and his sea to shining sea of America's heartland support.
December 3rd, 2016
By Barry Secrest
While it's fast becoming obvious that the 2016 election recount has far more to do with Hillary's last desperate grasp for power, rather than Jill Stein's less than zero chances of a miracle, the Pennsylvania recount is in the final process of wrapping up.
The results, as expected, changes nothing beyond garnering Clinton a few more rather questionable votes from the radically corrupt collectivist stronghold of Philadelphia, where an additional 20,000 votes were reportedly found.
Despite the odd surge in these newly found unchallenged votes, it still wasn't enough to overthrow Trump's mandate according to Pennsylvania officials who're now indicating that the recount has been all but wrapped up.
Moreover, the threshold of votes garnered by Trump in Pennsylvania won't allow a full recount due to Trump's still considerable remaining margin of votes over Clinton, which precludes any possibility of Clinton gaining a third chance in that newly-turned Trump red, state.
In Wisconsin, the recount request there, from Jill Stein, appears to be yielding similar negative results for Clinton.
After the first full day of recounting in Wisconsin, Clinton reportedly gained only one additional vote, which doesn't bode very well at all for Clinton, although the Wisconsin recount could, in fact, run until mid-December.
The rest of the story, as reported by the Associated Press:
"President-elect Donald Trump’s margin of victory in Pennsylvania is shrinking as more counties wrap up final tallies of provisional and overseas ballots.
An updated count Friday by state election officials shows Trump’s lead shrinking to 49,000 from 71,000 over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
A big chunk of newly counted Clinton votes came from Philadelphia.
Several counties are still finalizing totals, but Douglas Hill of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania says there aren’t enough uncounted ballots outstanding to change the outcome of Pennsylvania’s presidential election.
The update comes as Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein spearheads recount efforts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states where Trump narrowly beat Clinton.
Trump’s lead is 0.8 percent, down from over 1 percent, out of 6 million votes cast.
That’s shy of Pennsylvania’s 0.5 percent trigger for an automatic statewide recount."
November 28th, 2016
By Barry Secrest
Trump has been interviewing former CIA Director & ex-General David Petraeus as a prospective secretary of state. However, there is one major problem with Petraeus that very few people know about in that Petraeus and his "After America Agenda" goes directly against Trump's campaign credo of "Americanism, not globalism."
Think of it as "digging the footings" or maybe lining out the new foundation, because, we already have the plans being set into motion, but how do we get to the actual building phase, which necessarily ensues after the "great" tearing-down.
“After America, there is North America,” dutifully explains Ex-CIA Director David Petraeus, the former U.S. military commander , who was attending a conference titled “After America, What?”
The meeting was held at the Margaret Thatcher Conference on Liberty on June 18, 2014, as hosted by the Center for Policy Studies in Great Britain. Petraeus claims he "threw away the question mark and boldly proclaimed the coming North American decades." Petraeus, a member of both Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations, was essentially celebrating the end of the US Constitution which he once swore to defend.
5:48:31 "After America, what?" Chair: Professor Michael Clarke. Hon John Howard, Dr Keyu Jin, General Petraeus.
From New American: “The ex-commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq essentially celebrated the end of U.S. independence – and by extension, the demise of the Constitution.”
The plans for this union, go all the way back to NAFTA, during the Clinton Years, and actually extends well into the Bush years, as explained by Lou Dobbs in 2005:
President Bush, whose Father George H.W. Bush initially introduced "a new world order" for modern times, began laying the "official" groundwork in 2005, but when challenged on the plans originally titled as SPP, dumped the information from the White House's website.
While left-wing writers and publications typically bray like asses when contemplating such things as "The New World Order" and other machinations, including the climate change hoax, they simultaneously ignore world leaders, scientists, and prominent eschatologists when they anti-proselytize endlessly on these very subjects.
However, in early September 2014, none other than elitist Henry Kissinger published a book urging the need for this New World Order, in his tome accurately titled "World Order" which could easily be extrapolated out to mean "World Control," in the first several chapters.
The book is, in fact, dedicated to the need for this "New Order" while the luminaries mystifyingly wax antithetical on the very idea's existence.
So, the answer to all of these swirling questions with regard to why are they doing all of these things and what's the penultimate end-game, the answer seems to be hiding in plain site, at least for all who are willing to see it.
The end-game, at least for America, is the North American Union, which will then become a confederate nation within a globally controlled single governing body, with the UN acting as sergeant-at-arms.
However, as a future North American citizen, albeit one completely stripped of constitutional rights, one shouldn't feel left out--you see these plans extend across the globe for each major population sector as indicated in the lede graphic for this article.
For Europe, it began in 1999 with the advent of the European Union or Eurozone, from there the idea has matriculated into the UN in the form of agenda-21 also known as "sustainable development", among other agenda defining items, which is a world-conforming architecture designed to bring each nation into the initial stages of New World Order compliance.
The Rest of The Story Directly Concerns Trump's Evangelical Base of Voters
But there's a depth or perhaps a mysterious aspect to these facts which many know nothing about.
It's the premise that the original aspect of these international Unions or economic regions can be traced all the way back to ancient times-- as in the Biblical prophecies of both Daniel and Revelation, and much later pre-conceived in modern times by none other than an entity known as the "Club of Rome."
These prophecies in both Daniel and Revelation unveil the implication of a ten-kingdom structure being set up in the end times. Daniel 7:78 actually describes a fourth and final world kingdom of man consisting of ten horns or ten nation-states, the final one being destroyed by the coming of the Son of Man.
In essence, this has all been predicted long before, but now it appears to be happening.
According to Bible.org "The fourth kingdom under the domination of the little horn becomes a world empire described in the phrase: “Shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces” (Dan 7:23)." If this passage is allowed to speak as a genuine prophetic revelation, it necessarily requires a future ten-nation confederacy as a key to the political and international situation in the days just preceding the second coming of Christ and His kingdom."
But what of the Club of Rome?
Well, according to relatable research, the Club of Rome is a globalist New World Order group incepted in 1968. The Club of Rome hearkens back to Anglo-American financiers and the old "Black Nobility" families of Europe, who use social calamities to eventually achieve future subjects under a welfare state, making them both tractable and completely controllable in a very maniacal way, it would seem via the proxies of existing useful apparatchiks.
The overall impetus, within all of this, appears to be one of complete control across the planet by a centralized government, paving the way for one eventual "principle" achieving emperor-like status, via political manipulation and control.
You see, the thing to remember is that at no time in world history, has one centralized government ever been in control of the entire globe, however, the one-worlders have now trotted themselves out on the stage for all to see and are even now doing the necessary grunt work to achieve these ends, which they will no doubt see as good, at least at first.
Trump, a fervent anti-globalist, is most likely, completely unaware of Petraeus' agenda, back in 2014, of promoting the North American Union, however, this only highlights the insidiousness of a movement consistently denied by the US media in public that is being fervently followed internationally by global elites behind semi-closed doors.
November 22nd, 2016
By Barry Secrest
When we began our journey of dire discovery, about 8 years ago, we stumbled onto the title for an article that would eventually become a book, aptly titled "A Perfect Liberal Storm," as mal-dedicated to a Fourth Estate that no longer effectively existed along with a shadowy US regime with far less than America's best interests at heart.
Now, it's time to loose the bookend article title, as if in answer, that so many of us have all worked so hard on in informing America as to what's really happening in our nation. All of this, by the way, with a great deal of help from the Tea Party, the anti-establishment movement, and of course, Mr. Donald Trump, himself, who's far more conservative than most give him credit for being. (Pshhh!)
It all pretty much came together, for America, in 2016, Thus the title, "A Perfect Conservative Storm," and just in time for Thanksgiving, even while Donald Trump appears to be appointing an administration that would make even Ronald Reagan's blush with red state envy.
In fact, most Americans have emerged from the turbulence of the 2016 election much the wiser and far more hopeful than perhaps at any time in the last 20 years. The rest of America, in the form of snowflakes, are still sobbing in their "safe space" corners--waiting for more play-doh and crayons by which to outwardly exorcise their angst.
As for traditional America, our education, it would seem, is almost complete.
Indeed, our 4th estate--also known as the traditional media--as 2016 wore on, proved itself to be well beyond contemptuous even as that same media now insists that things will be different in the future--which rather rudely- (only shortly thereafter) became something more accurately akin to the approaching future's future, or at least something along that particularly distant timeline.
They couldn't stop even if they wanted to.....and we all know it.
First things first, folks, they'll never change in the [alt-left] traditional media and they'll never stop trying to transform America's cultural placeholders into some dark and twistingly weird civil society version of the Stepford wives, which is really about all they truly desire, in the first place.
Further, America as a nation is not even cautiously optimistic on the question of the conventional media's building Stormfront against Trump. We already knew that the new Commander-in-Chief will never be treated as fairly as Obama, nor even the current iteration of Hillary, which sounds like a joke, even as it's being written.
However, now we do have the glistening new media tools to fight back--which is why you see so many left-wing social media providers gearing up to diminish the actual truthtellers in print, but alas for they on the old media, it simply will not work.
Oh, they're very busy little elves, skittering about trying to create new algorithms and even trying to induce new narratives, the latest being that one about "fake news" and even the outrageous alibi that "fake news stories" are what caused Hillary to lose. All of this even as Wikileaks, DC Leaks, and even the NSA have proven that the actual purveyors of "fake news story atrocities" is none other than America's mainstream media.
We Can Never Go Back
Traditionally inclined Americans now also know that things, most assuredly, will never be quite the same, no matter how hard the media tries to redeem itself--especially to those it considers as the nation's both deplorable & unredeemable torch wielders--you know, the same ones they've been laughing at while simultaneously lying to us, and right in our faces.
They in the media are now viewed as nothing much more than the nation's wife beaters in print, and while we know that they might possibly mean it, at least for a time, when they initially spoke of the media's new role of changing, we know what will truly happen just as soon as America's at its most vulnerable, back turned and unsuspecting.
They'll twist on us just as their mood descends into its ever-present darkness, once again, and then figuratively bang us down till we're draped across our hearths, bloodied & battered.
When you get right down to it, they are the collectively co-opted sneaky little girly-men & menly-girls, of the media, and it's just who they are....
But, we, as Americans, are not so naive as we once were, moreover, even better, now we've been alerted and we've watches set upon every high tower, with signal fires ready to be lit, if needs be, oh, and with subscriptions staged to be unmercifully canceled.
In fact, the mainstream media, globalists one and all, as presented to most of America, is nothing much more than a huddle of high-minded crack addicts who whore themselves about amongst the left of center political class oligarchs and their political establishment minions. In fact, the ruling class, as we now view them, command the media only as cruel to be nice pimps, with less than nothing to recommend them.
Conversely, we also can boast of a new media that has become firmly established and it shined brilliantly as the unsung heroes of 2016 and America's truest voice, in print.
It was venues like The Drudge Report, Breitbart, and The Daily Caller, that made our days while Fox Business and Fox News and even Infowars and Newsmax made our nights.
While Hillary griped and swore to shut not a few of us down after her inauguration--which thankfully now--will never happen, they poured on the accelerant with ever righteous contempt-- outing every scintilla of evidence against she who would've been queen, and her less than lesser kings.
Those of us who dug deepest with websites that actually drew blood, at many times, knew that if Hillary wasn't defeated by Trump, her dead pool would most likely grow ever the deeper, and none of us were truly safe as her gorgon eyes cast rheumily about for her next victim(s).
It was always a black joke, among we anti-establishment writers and our opposition readers, that an Obama FEMA Camp might be in our immediate future; one mere glance at the nation of Turkey tells the whole alternative story.
Which then brings us to take a look at the true winners and losers for 2016, if not the decade, aside from all of the usual suspects. This, from a website now documented to be proven always right, 100% of the time with absolutely no apologies proffered, but a multitude therein, graciously accepted.
Losers & Winners For 2016
First Losers prize goes to establishment Neo-Cons & former heroes Charles Krauthammer, and lesser batboy, George Will, of the Amazonian [Washington] Post.
They're now nothing if not a couple of miscalculating Bezos and most Conservatives cannot stand either one of them, as true traitors, any longer.
Men whose glistening monotones continually insisted, with acid dripping from their pack-rat jowls --venomously-- that Trump would never win, and from the start. Were Chuck a stock, we would have loved to have bought him for what he's worth, and sold him for what he (and the rest of the media) thinks he's worth while hedging George Will.
We'd be wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice, on both counts.
Conversely, First Winners' prize for 2016, in that same vein, goes to Conservative co-champs Pat Buchanan & Lou Dobbs, of the anti-globalist prefect. Much like us, they had Trump pegged as a winner from the very start.
Dobb's nightly commentary was always incisive, especially with Ed Rollins, while Buchanan, despite being of the old political school, still could see what was happening and communicated repeatedly what needed to be said about Trump, with millions looking on and learning.
2nd Losers Prize goes to co-globalists George Soros, Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal, and while Soros is not of the WSJ, maybe he should be, all things being equal, although America might never know that Soros, as titular leader of the Democrat party, ever existed if the civil society only read America's largest conventional newspapers.
Soros, we hope, should soon be arrested assuming the Trump DOJ does its job both fully and completely in chasing down Soro's methodology of sedition and paid rioters, sometimes costing life-- not to mention the many instances of violence, that Soros is, without a doubt, responsible for.
Then come Noonan and Stephens, who stand out among the best of the worst of all so-called conservative columnists, who aren't really all that conservative.
While oozing an impressive array of multi-syllabic contretemps, regarding both Noonan and Stephens, their song words, as rendered opinions, rang out as not much better than poorly strung together nursery rhymes. Their writings were the crude equivalent of stickman art on a canvas splayed with excrement, by less than scrupulous monkies in desperate heat.
2nd Winners' place prize goes to radio / talk show icon Sean Hannity, and Alex Jones of Infowars fame who never wavered in their contempt for both the establishment and the globalist sects, while also never wavering in their support of Trump.
On a daily basis , both exposed what America needed to see & know, even as Jones constantly took his viewers behind the scenes to see the grisly scene of how planetary political sausage is actually made.
Both have emerged as my personal favorites and both have proved themselves as champions of liberty and conservatism.
Bonus points--the mainstream media despises them both with a passion-- and that says it all.
The Wall Street Journal gets the 3rd place loser's co-award, while not nearly as bad as the NYT and the WP, the supposedly semi-conservative leaning WSJ played ultra-spin the bottle with almost every news article as an attempt to french Hillary sans full tongue dan la gorge --while simultaneously back-bending Trump for a hump du jour, albeit subtly in most of their reports.
Joining the WSJ, in the number third place loser co-slot, is none other than the insidious Koch Brothers and their GOP establishment back-stabbers and they all know all-to-well, who they are--we'll be watching each of these anti-American globalists very closely going forward.
They locked Trump out of their inner-workings, from the very start, and even stated their possible intent to vote for Hillary, while simultaneously trying to hide their amnesty & open borders goals, from the base, and from the start.
Indeed, from a close look at Europe and all of their elitist kleptocrats, Globalists never win.....
3rd Winners prize' goes to the NSA, Julian Assange, and WikiLeaks, for helping to expose, via a panoply of harmful doc releases, who and or what, both Clinton and the Democrats truly are, for those of the unsuspecting class.
4th place Losers recognition must then go to Barack Obama and the Democrats, and of course, the Never-Trumpers, who while obviously radiating culpability as America's most concentrated forms of kryptonite, made it well beyond clear both who and what they were about, for anyone who cared to actually see it.
Obama's legacy, if things go as they should, is about to be stuffed down the mother of all legacy shredders, in pro-American Donald Trump, which will ultimately work to Obama's good, at least as history may see it, regrettably, assuming a financial meteor doesn't hit America before the Trump effect fully takes hold.
4th place Winners goes to goes to America's most conservative of babes, Laura Ingraham, and Ann Coulter, who after a few early hiccups, ultimately jumped on the Trump train and rode it to the end --their place- ranking into the highs as also being very easy on the eyes, and therefore attracting a profligate amount of attention that might otherwise have strayed.
Yes, yes, of course, they're both brilliant, and that plus a quarter buys you a piece of bubble gum, now shush!
5th Losers Prize goes to the anti-co-champs of both the National Review and Red State, websites, who equally played their neo-con roles in print with enough preordained lunacy to go around, and then some.
By the way, National Review's mojo is now to the point that it's giving away a free year, alas if we could only burn it in our fireplace with the same effectiveness as the Charlotte Observer.
Notice the lovely shade of purple in their award? That wasn't an accident.... Oh, and I wonder if both of these "analyst sites" still think that Trump was merely Hillary Clinton's cuckold staged for her to win the presidency?
These two sites get the True Dumb-ass awards, as well.
Even worse, is Eric Erickson the Red's, Red State's state, which, it appears, will soon be dropping out of the top-ranking, for all mainline websites
Hope Erickson kept his day job.....oh, and no more Rush Limbaugh guest-commentating for you, Erickson! Few, if any, ever listened anyway....
5th Winner's special prize goes to the websites Judicial Watch & Project Veritas, who probably more than any other venues, puts their money where their mouths are, and then some.
Judicial Watch, while ranked similarly as this website in readership, has probably both exposed itself to the greatest degree and done far more, behind the scenes, than almost any other known conservative site, with the possible exception of James O'Keefe and his website Project Veritas, and for that, we're all truly thankful.
One site is hosted by a cadre of very powerful all-American attornies, who are constantly hauling the big dogs of the establishment off to court, while uber-effectively demanding Freedom of Information act documents, in an effort towards keeping things at least somewhere miles within honest.
The other, by a courageous young man in O' Keefe, who'll prove to be a true expose' powerhouse in the future, as the anti-globalist war heats up across all continents.
They are the unsung heroes of the anti-establishment movement.
A Bonus co-Losers' last place award goes to CNN and its panel of self-important busybodies acting on TV as actual journalists.
They're the Democrat Party's Henchmen & info babe-babblers-- although their favorite methodology is that of poisoning the well surreptitiously rather than at least facing their opponents, like true combatants.
They're the go-to cowards of the media, and they're co-joined by none other than CBS, NBC, NPR, and ABC News, who we might have ranked a good deal higher if anyone with any sense, either in or out of the media, actually took them seriously.
The networks are nothing if not the send-in-the-clowns segment of the 4th Estate-- if that...
Outside of the media, we'd be remiss if we left out our new heroes in the form of formerly blue states now turned red hot, with a thanksgiving cornucopia of electoral votes--those being Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Ohio.
For those high-minded in particular who think they may have been left out, oops, there's nothing scientific at all about this review, it was merely all about who came to mind and when, while in the course of jotting all of this down.
No apologies offered nor accepted, and as for our winning losers...they can all just eat crow for Thanksgiving as if they didn't deserve it.
Happy Thanksgiving to all and Godspeed to both America and Donald Trump...