CRN Politics

By Barry Secrest

We saw the strange beginnings to the current political reality back during Obama's first few years in office. 

The often bizarre policy movements, the ostracization of formerly conservative-Democrat stars, the abrupt exodus of all the remaining left-wing conservatives and moderates from the Democratic side of congress--even the hard-to-starboard (Extreme Left) maneuvering of the mainstream media.

Something very odd had taken place, especially in the last years of Bush and those first few years of Obama's ascendancy. Maybe its impetus can be found in the events associated with 9/11, and the ensuingly endless wars.

However, it was to become more an extermination than evacuation within the left-wing of US politics. In fact, it had gotten so horrid that it sparked a groundswell US political movement known as the Tea Party, that has, today, almost completely destroyed the Democrat party, while becoming a hardened facet of the conservative groundswell.

Back in those days, they laughed about this new conservative movement--they're not laughing now.

But, even more bizarre, might be the fact that this strange new progressive paradigm had also taken hold of at least part of the Republican party, and that hold, while tenuous, maintains a least a partial grip on the GOP leadership, of today.

A Complete Party Takeover

Point-in-fact, most individuals, now, stare at you in odd wonder if you bring up the prospect of a politically active conservative democrat as if you might have some bizarre specter peering over your left shoulder.

Oddly enough, despite the ongoing deprivations of the Democrat party, rather than moderating their disastrous approach, they are becoming even more radicalized, today, and it continues to grow worse. 

Before we knew it, after 2012, virtually every single remnant of the old Democrat party was for the better part either gone or transformed; and their replacements were more in the mold of rabid progressivism rather than liberal Democratism; they have infested almost the entire Democrat party and they may not be done yet.

The only problem being, now, their party is in all but its death throes, and yet blinded by their cult-like faith, they stubbornly fail to see their resounding weirdness. Still, they stagger forward like zombies, clinging to some murky prize that cannot be given voice.

In full retrospect, one man stands at the apex of the decimation, the destroyer, his name is George Soros.

Soros, the Left's titular leader and billionaire anti-hero, thrills in his own personal specialty of destruction, and is well beyond expert at it, but alas, the man appears to know less than nothing about building, at least not beyond the interests of his own pocketbook.  

Soros, the Democrat's pro-Islamic architect of destruction, by the way, turned out to be the Republican establishment's stipend of hollowed-out victory, in spite of their not completely dissimilar goals.  But, the GOP establishment-distrusting American traditionalist movement, in the midst of this political upheaval, also saw its opportunity and furiously seized it.

If Soros was the demolitionist, then the Conservatives would emplace a builder; tired of the constant betrayals, the traditionalists selected their own champion from completely outside of the GOP political establishment.

It was the right move.

It worked

Promising the end of conservative American traditionalism for all time, Soros thought to wield a radical New Age movement of "Government-as-God" in his final transformation of America, as initiated by his rather precocious understudy, Barack Obama, who unexpectantly ran headlong into the Tea Party movement's takeover of Congress.

A delay that could be corrected, in Soros' next flourish.

However, as Soros moved his Queen into the final position of checkmate, for America, the poorly executed play would end up delivering his ultimate undoing; you see, while Soros had thought that his political playing piece would lose the popular vote but win the electoral college, the exact opposite would actually end up happening.

Soros in an August 2016 interview

Indeed, the ongoing admonition that Clinton had no actual political message for the American people wasn't exactly factual then, and it certainly isn't now. Clinton had a really big plan that simply could not be communicated for fear that her true message would have completely decimated the entire campaign.

When Soros, in late 2016, finally peered into the fired altars of his scorched-earth wicker-man agenda, hoping to see the charred and final remains of conservative American traditionalism, there stood instead his worst nightmare, the anti-Obama, almost completely untouched and ready for action.

Donald Trump emerged unscathed by Soros' unholy sorcerer's fire like an angry bull in a China Shop and started toppling and smashing almost every single political idol of the left, he could find. From the EPA to the judiciary, to iron-cladding the 1st and 2nd amendments, the sound of crushed and broken left-wing intentions has been almost deafening (and endlessly entertaining) at the same time.

Oh, they'll certainly fight back, on all the many fronts, but their concerted rejection of protecting America's most basic sovereignties will only expose their truest designs, to the American people, even further.

The true liberals remaining (not the progressives) have been forced to either move into stealth mode or proclaim fealty to a radical new fundamentalist approach regarding all things government & the planet. It's either all the radical way or the highway, and since the time of Trump's  inauguration, an even stranger paradigm has finally begun to step out of the Democrat-aligned shadows.

A Globalist Manifesto

Soros, now, completely defeated and nearing the end of his time here on Earth, at age 86, remains furious and has decided that he will get even with both the Conservatives and Trump if it's the last thing that he might accomplish, at least while above ground.

Soros, enraged, has gone nuclear in his politics, and the Dems are following suit. Soros has reiterated his movement against anyone standing in the way of a progressive open borders,anti-patriotic agenda, by funding the ultra-fascist Antifa movement, fueled by the twin evils of Mammon and pure rage.

Their manufactured God(s), a be-all-end-all government controlling everything, much like the fabled golden idol, must be knelt to and worshiped, on a continual basis, at least as they see it. But, unfortunately, their deity had been, at least momentarily, absconded by the worse kind of heretic, in President Donald Trump.

Trump is, for all intents and purposes, the beast of their anti-apocalypse; an anti-progressive Christian who loves Israel while swearing to uphold the basic tenets of both Christianity and the Constitution while taming government back down into a controlled interest of the people, rather than a semi-benevolent dictator of all the many things, in the Soros mold.

Moreover, It's difficult to label Trump a fascist dictator as he actively abdicates certain powers back to the individual states, where it belongs. The new president, as it turns out, is a master of decentralization, in the Jackson mold, and that's certainly not by any accident.

Meanwhile, a shocked and angry but now cuckolded GOP leadership can, today, only look on in fascinated misery; but they can do little, out in the open, beyond grimacing in debased defeat. That is, at least, until the occasion of the next transnational legislative moment, eventually comes along.  

Trump, it could be seen, is either a new direction for America or at least a well-needed pause for the inevitability of what may eventually be coming, if America's traditional precepts are not brought powerfully back into the forefront.

The US, at least as the world has come to know her for the last quarter millennia, will be no more, if the current paradigm of indoctrination is not completely corrected, and quickly.

But, the penultimate question becomes, is it too late? Trump doesn't seem to think so.

Despite all of this, sadly enough, most mainstream political pundits still fail to recognize what is now actually happening; they ignore both the new divisions and the old evacuations while chalking it up to liberal divisiveness, but, what if all the conventional answers are no longer viable?

This new paradigm, manifest Globalism, is, in fact, the new age belief system that has infected the Democrat party and transformed it into what many believe is an immeasurably unreal political entity, drowning within its own heavily flawed grandeur-agist presumptions that flow from parts virtually unknown, at least to those who remain completely unschooled in such things.

 A New Science

They, the social justice warriors of Soros and his political minions, call it Globalization, their detractors call it Globalism, and while they couch their overall sentiments as gravitating towards what could only be termed as a multicultural One-World society, they've become the indoctrinated victims of a movement that seeks far more than merely an all-encompassing centralized society.

The cult of Globalism's first commandment requires adherence within the belief system of Climate Change, from there, all other tenets of the faith align intrinsically towards each of the all-encompassing precepts. 

The canon of Climate Change requires a fundamental change to all of the planet's economic systems in order to control the unholy gas that is carbon dioxide, which is, ironically, the breath of all planetary plant life, providing sustenance to all the various organisms on earth. 

Carbon dioxide is, to the climate change movement, as sin is to the protestant movement, and carbon dioxide, while impossible to completely eliminate, must needs be controlled, to avoid the planet's being engulfed in the flames of industry's immorality.

A Jehovah's Witness Pamphlet from 2014

 An All-Encompassing Government

But, climate change is only a precept largely for the naive communist allegories of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie;  next, we have the basic precepts for the planetary power-players, those who must be convinced that all war and conflict are a result of political divisiveness and lack of multicultural engagement.

Therefore, putting an end to the sovereignty of individual governments by virtue of heavily concealed trade laws and divergent cultural traditions, while eventually either destroying or seizing all weapons of mass destruction,  will result, they say, in a one-world authority that will benevolently mediate and control nearly every population center at every corner of the Earth.

In order to avoid all future conflict, they further indicate, requires a New World Order system with a controlling centralized authority and a new, more socially just economic system, by which the world will live in the grandest of utopian contentments.

This, they assert, will put an end to wars and all the historical pretexts for a planet everlastingly enshrouded within the miseries of perpetual conflict.

A One-World Religion

Due to the deprivations of conflict within each of the world's various faiths, their goal is a new ecumenical movement which must be engendered in order to dissolve and absorb all the world's faiths into one vast new age belief system.

Much like Islam, this one-world religion will borrow various spiritual elements from each of the world's major religions, while also mixing in certain platitudes which will include the omnipotent ingredient of systemic government and approved science, into the new matrix.

Those who reject this new religion of peace will likely be dealt with in a progressive array of reconditionings at best, however, with the various assaults we've seen on those who reject this new age awakening taking place in the various domains of progressivity, it shouldn't be difficult to imagine how that could ultimately play out.

A One-World Society

Each of the above precepts, in addition to quite a few many others, within this multicultural conflation, will result in the final revisioning necessary for the world to receive the illuminated manifestation of what they will refer to as the one true light, in all the universe, that the planet, as it turns out, certainly has not been waiting for, but will get, nonetheless.

It will be a tyrannical omniverse for a completely recycled human condition.

And, while it's difficult to presume the timetable for all of the moving parts to coincide, it seems well beyond clear that for the better part of the entire planet, we are seeing the birth pains; it is well on its calamitous way, but will our America somehow become subdued to this age-old revenant?

Make no mistake, we are witnessing its inimical advent, right here, and right now.

CRN Politics

By Barry Secrest

So, the uber-Progressive party that is now the Democrats, which has virtually been destroyed over the last three elections, pretty much, somehow, got almost everything it desired in Trump’s 2017 budget.

 The headline, as recounted by Rush Limbaugh, today, read as follows: “Congress Deal Funds Sanctuary Cities, Obamacare, EPA, Planned Parenthood; Does Not Provide Money for the Wall.”

The Democrats should be ecstatic, but, have you ever known anyone on the political left to be ecstatic about anything beyond gay marriage, illegal aliens, Socialism, and Obama?

So, if indeed the GOP, as led by Trump, is now in charge of America, then why is it that the Democrat Party continually seems to rule the day on all things legislation?

Monday’s announcement, on the 2017 Budget agreement, presents a long list of conservative capitulations by the Republicans, to the Democrats.

So, then, how is it that the Democrats are still calling all the shots despite their vast losing record?

The answer, at least in conventional political circles, suggests that the GOP just doesn’t have the heart, and/or the Republican leadership’s afraid of a full government shutdown,  or even better, “they [ the GOP] is just so used to being the party out of power and in opposition that they just don’t know how to govern.”

Democrats confident they can block Trump’s agenda after spending bill win

While all of those things could be true, it’s really quite difficult to believe, at least when viewed in any sort of analytical sense, especially with the vast amount of legislative experience that congress keeps telling us is necessary to successfully govern.

So,  what is it that’s actually happening, then, if the real reason doesn’t really fall under the often ridiculous excuses they’ve been offering? Why is it that the party in power cannot seem to govern on its own terms rather than those of the losing Democrats?  

Our answer while disturbing seems to make far more sense than the answers we’ve been getting.

It’s not that the GOP can’t lead under Trump’s promised conservative agenda, rather, it’s that they simply do not wish to; because it goes against the more globalist designs of both the Democrat and GOP leadership.

As stated a number of times before, it’s not just the political establishment, which traditional America, and now Trump, is fighting against.  

There continues to be a significant component missing which allows us to more clearly paint the shadowy target, that is the actual problem. The better answer is the simple fact that it’s the globalist infiltration, into our government, that’s been running congress now for quite some time and that seems to continue to be the dug-in paradigm, at present, despite Trump’s soaring electoral victory.

Trump’s ‘big beautiful wall’ is not in the spending plan. Will it ever get built?

The Democrats have already been all but taken over by these global agents of stealthy contrived chaos, under Soros, along with a wide swath of the GOP leadership, as often dictated by the Koch Brothers and many, many others, both inside and out of the traditional power circles.

Remember when the Kochs not only threatened to vote for Hillary but then made good on their stance by also locking Trump out of their political operations center?

It is they, the open-borders, anti-patriots of globalism, who appear to now be running the show, as they were during Obama’s two terms. The only difference, now, is that Trump’s not onboard while Obama certainly was.

Even in the final years of Obama’s term, in which the GOP had both houses of congress–from the debt ceiling to the funding of Obama’s illegal alien amnesty program–the Republicans seemed to have almost completely adopted Obama’s uber-Progressive agenda, and with only a very few exceptions.

In fact, even now the GOP seems to be in favor, of nearly all of Obama’s entire leftist agenda that remains as dictated via marching orders to America’s Political ruling class from some murky other-place, up far, far higher (or far, far deeper) than the executive branch of our government.

So, once you understand these simple facts, the depressing headlines that you keep seeing, regarding failure after failure, mixed in with Trump’s personal victories, will begin to make a great deal more sense to you.

Rush Limbaugh has the rest of the story on the budget, as it regards the particulars, from a brilliantly conventional standpoint in part:

“Now, if you look at that headline and you happen to believe that it’s true — which it is. I mean, we extended the budget. There’s not gonna be any shutdown. Republicans are going (sigh), “Thank God! No shutdown.” So we’ve extended the budget, not for a week, but all the way through September.

In the process, sanctuary cities are continually funded.

Obamacare is not repealed nor is it replaced.

The White House is saying that they’re very close to having enough votes in the House to actually move forward on Obamacare.

But until we see the vote, we will know they don’t have the votes. They’re not gonna conduct a vote ’til they have them. So Obamacare gets funded. Sanctuary cities get funded. The EPA gets funded through September. Planned Parenthood gets funded. The wall does not. So if you’re asking yourself, “Why am I voting Republican?” you have a good question.

Why is anybody voting Republican, if this is what happens when we win?

We won the House, we won the Senate, we won the White House, and the Democrats thwarted everything we supposedly said we were going to do with our victory. Well, I don’t want to use the word “we,” ’cause I’ve got nothing to do with this.

This is another reason why I do not get close to these people. I do not… I would not relish having to have you call here today and make me justify what all happened here, had I been out there promoting and ballyhooing. That’s why I keep my distance from these people, ’cause I don’t have any control over what they’re gonna do or say, what their policies are going to be.

But I think this illustrates a much larger problem that we are going to have to recognize, and it’s the real reason Donald Trump was elected. It’s the real thing that he has got to do, and he’s got to start doing it. And it is not going to happen if he continues to work with Republicans, because it is obvious, for whatever reasons — and we can get into them — the Republican Party has no intention of defunding Planned Parenthood, no intention of defunding sanctuary cities.

They don’t want to pay for a wall. Who knows what they really want in Obamacare. But then again, is it really the Republicans? I think there’s something much larger going on.”

Please Keep Reading or Listen Here

 Words mean things....

CRN Politics

By Barry  Secrest

Most readers of the Wall Street Journal, including this writer, were stunned this morning, after reading of Trump's comments regarding his decision not to cancel NAFTA.

However, it wasn't Trump's reversal on NAFTA, where he did, in fact, state during his campaign that he would seek a complete renegotiation rather than an outright cancellation, of the job-devouring trade agreement, if possible.

Rather, it was his closing words, in the WSJ article, where he stated the following:

“Hey, I’m a nationalist and a globalist,” Trump declared to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, further stating, “I’m both.”

The question for most of Trump's voters, after well over one year of hearing Trump consistently trash-talking the failed agenda of multicultural globalism, would now be which side, exactly, does Trump fall on?

Moreover, how can a leader, or anyone else for that matter, be both a  nationalist and a globalist, at the same time?

Unfortunately, the people that voted Trump into office, his base, have continually fallen victim to the GOP leadership's prevailing mindset of being two things at once, during Trump's first 100 days.

The leaders don't appear to be serious about repealing and replacing Obamacare any more than they are serious about building the wall that propelled Trump into his office. When the wall is brought up, in the inner-beltway inner circles, the politicians laugh, raucously, despite most of them having voted for such a wall back in 2006.

They are, in fact, laughing at both Trump and a now politically wounded American traditional voter.

In fact, with all the talk of transgenderism, it almost seems fitting that the American traditionalist voter largely sees our congressional GOP leadership as a fuzzy form of trans-republicanism.

They, the GOP leaders, mostly say all the right things, however, when an important policy decision comes along, that enables the path of globalism, against overall US interests, they'll routinely transform into lockstep, along with their left-wing progressive counterparts in the Democrat party, and then, after the blow has been delivered on behalf of international interests, it's back to the kabuki theater routine for all of our fake political amusement.

Trump, unfortunately, cannot have it both ways; he can't serve the interests of America and the interests of international globalism at the same time--it would be tantamount to serving two masters at the same time--and those two battling masters, in particular, will always be at severe odds.

The bellwether model to at least look towards, for understanding such a political agenda, would be the EU and its unelected representatives who've created unimaginable chaos within their own various nations under the murky demigods of globalism.

Moreover, it should be noted that for the most part, all of Trump's domestic policy moves would seem to contraindicate any sort of migration towards globalism, for his part; however, his foreign policy moves, with regard to globalism, leaves room for at least some doubt to creep in.

All in all, however, it's the very thing Trump campaigned against, and his reversal, now on globalism, would mean that much of his campaign was a complete, if not unmitigated, lie and maybe even worse.

His promises would then be all but less than worthless, as well, if this new paradigm were truly the case, but, there are quite a few Neocons, who were formerly Trump's sworn enemies, celebrating fervently on this particular bit of news, today.

The question, on Trump's sudden affectation for globalism, becomes one of was he really serious after all of his railings against it during the entirety of his campaign? It's a question, by the way, that we should not have to ask.