CRN Politics

By Barry Secrest

There are between 23 and 30 countries which have effectively refused to take back their citizens, who've entered the United States unlawfully it's now being learned, and this from multiple credible sources.

However, the facts only begin there.

According to the Daily Caller, these nations are also refusing "to accept the deportations of illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes in the U.S" says Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar, in a recent interview with Sheryl Attkisson.

Meanwhile, these same countries are still being issued Visas and even student visas by the U.S. government.

So, does America, now, need to legislate a law which will put a halt to this practice?

Again, according to Congressman Cuellar, "there is already a law on the books which allows the U.S. to hold visas from a country that is not taking back its criminals, but the U.S. is not enforcing it."

Thus yet another US immigration law that's not being enforced, no doubt, a practice begun within both the Obama & Bush administrations which remains in place; hopefully, only because Trump's cabinet appointments have been held up by the Democrats.

However, in our research, we were also able to uncover several, perhaps even worse coincidental facts, that probably leave these irresponsible nations, literally, rolling on the floor laughing at either how poorly America is being run, or how vapid its political leaders are.

In our research, it was relatively easy to uncover the fact that most of the same nations who are refusing to take back their citizens are simultaneously receiving hundreds of millions in foreign aid from the United States government.

The List By Order of the Worst & Planned US Financial Aid

*  Denotes nations on Trump's travel ban

Cuba -  Planned US Foreign Assistance - $15 Million

China - Planned US foreign assistance- $6.8 Million 

Somalia - Planned US foreign assistance - $196.3 Million

India - Planned US foreign assistance -  $76 Million

Ghana  Planned US foreign assistance - none

Iraq -  Planned US foreign assistance - $510 Million

Iran  - Planned US foreign assistance  - none- although Iran received as much as $33.6 Billion in Cash, Gold Payments From Obama regime

• Afghanistan - Planned US foreign assistance - $1.25 Billion

• 
  
• Libya - Planned US foreign assistance -$20. 5 Million
• 

• 
  
• Algeria - Planned US foreign assistance -$2.3 Million
• 
  

• 
  
• Vietnam - Planned US foreign assistance -$132 million

• 
  
• Haiti - Planned US foreign assistance -$218 million

• 
  
• Zimbabwe - Planned US foreign assistance - $150 million
• 
  

^The majority of the countries on the list are either communist or Islamic.

It most likely goes without saying that were the United States to suspend foreign aid to these nations, the roadblocks presented in disallowing the return of these illegal aliens would quickly evaporate.

What's worse, perhaps, were the nations that we were able to inspect, receiving foreign aid from the US, despite the fact that these nations are either very wealthy or very hostile, to America.

With his latest utterances, it almost seems that this particular pope goes to extracurricular labors to both consolidate his standing as the prophecied secular-globalist pope of the End Times, while seeming, more often than not, to be a mystical oddity at the international petting zoo, kept up by the global elites…..

CRN Religion

By Barry Secrest

The Jesuit pope has once again let loose with a series of statements which essentially trendlines his status as the “New World Order” pope, and under no uncertain terms.

In fact, it almost seems that this particular pope goes to extracurricular labors to both consolidate his standing as the prophecied secular-globalist pope of the End Times, while seeming, more often than not, to be a mystical oddity at the international petting zoo, kept up by the global elites.

In the pope’s latest Jesuit misadventures, Francis, again, firmly placed himself as a member of the globalist axis in good standing, as allied against the many millions of traditional Catholics who value, not only their own national  cultures, but also the historical culture of the Catholic Church, which appears to be fading fast.

In the pope’s initial antithetical declaration, a document which appeared in a major Catholic institutional website laid forth the need for a global central banking monetary institution, or authority, which would consolidate all the other various banks into one behemoth financial institution.

It’s the stuff of nightmares as if the various central banks, across the planet, are not already intimately entwined.

But, for all the Evangelical watchers out there, especially those who are steeped in the prophecies of Daniel, Ezekial, and Revelation, among others, the chill which probably ran up their spines, must have felt like they’d backed into an electric fence.

Meanwhile, or conversely, the secular banking elites of the global [anti-Christ] movement, must have been dancing a serpentine jig in the streets.

From the website Antonio Aquinas comes our first rather alarming story:

“It seems the current occupant of St. Peter’s Chair will take on a new function which is outside the purview of the office that the Divine Founder of his institution had clearly mandated.

Besides being a self-proclaimed expert on global warming and a vociferous advocate of societal-wrecking mass immigration, it looks as if “Pope” Francis has entered the realm of global economics specifically, international monetary policy.

 In an 18-page document issued through the Vatican’s Office of Justice and Peace, Bergoglio has called for, among other repressive and wealth-destructive measures, the establishment of a “supranational [monetary] authority” to oversee international monetary affairs:

“In fact, one can see an emerging requirement for a body that will carry out the functions of a kind of ‘central world bank’ that regulates the flow and system of monetary exchanges similar to the national central banks."*

The paper, “Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of a Global Public Authority,” contends that a world central bank is needed because institutions such as the IMF have failed to “stabilize world finance” and have not effectively regulated “the amount of credit risk taken on by the system.”

Naturally, as one of the planet’s preeminent social justice warriors, Bergoglio claims that if a world central bank is not commissioned, then the gap between rich and poor will be exacerbated even further:

“If no solutions are found to the various forms of injustice, the negative effects that will follow on the social, political and economic level will be destined to create a climate of growing hostility and even violence, and ultimately undermine the very foundations of democratic institutions, even the ones considered most solid.”

Bergoglio acknowledges that if a central monetary authority is established it will mean a loss of sovereignty and independence among nations, but such “costs” are well worth the overall societal and economic gains:

“Of course, this transformation will be made at the cost of a gradual, balanced transfer of a part of each nation’s powers to a world authority and to regional authorities, but this is necessary at a time when the dynamism of human society and the economy and the progress of technology are transcending borders, which are in fact already very eroded in a globalized world.”

While the document demonstrates that Bergoglio has not a clue of basic monetary theory, it shows again that the “pope” is a radical socialist who has more in common with the loony ideas of Karl Marx than he does with Roman Catholicism” (Source)

In our 2nd  installment, of the most recent and requisitely bizarre agenda of the “New World Order” Pope, Bergoglio, again, took aim at the anti-globalist movement taking place across the planet, which has proven exceedingly dangerous to the incremental designs of the global elite.

From the UK Independent:

“Pope Francis has warned in an interview with a German newspaper of the dangers of rising populism in western democracies. The pope told Die Zeit on Thursday “populism is evil and ends badly as the past century showed.” He also said he rejects any kind of cult around the papacy and that he’s a normal believer just like everyone else.”

But, it wasn’t just the Pope’s bold, if not anti-democratic stance against nations interested in preserving their various cultural identities, he then let loose with an ad hominem attack on all of those who’ve never encountered a lapse of their own respective faith, in their creator.

Francis stated, again, from the Independent:

“I don’t see myself as anything special… I’m a sinner, I’m fallible.” In the first major interview that Francis has given a German newspaper, the pope was asked whether he experienced moments in which he doubted the existence of God. He responded: “I, too, know moments of emptiness.

But, he pointed out periods of crisis are also a chance to grow, saying a believer who doesn’t experience that remains “infantile.” 

Or perhaps confident in their faith?

But, from another, more critical angle, did not the pope, in fact, just castigate as infantile, all of those, including the many millions in his own flock, who’ve remained more or less certain of their faith in a creator of whom the pope stands, at least for the better part, as a rather indignant press secretary?

Not exactly a confidence builder for those of a lesser certainty, when it comes to faith, it should be noted.

But, at some particular point, most Catholics probably should begin asking themselves which particular god, or demi-god, this pope stands as earthly representative, to.

But then, almost as yet another chilling secular corollary point, in tandem with the pope’s religious political denouncement, one of the world’s leading physicists, atheist Stephen Hawking, was simultaneously calling for a ‘world government’in order to ward off his belief that technology will eventually destroy the world.

A definite ill wind is blowing, as we can certainly see when the secular scientific and the religious sectors team up with the global elite in anticipation of a much sought-after centralized world government [agenda] at least among stupendously wealthy international actors.

 Listen: CRLive 3/8: Spies R Us, Deep State Truth, Trump Puts Obama on Defensive

From Infowars

While Democrats feverishly sought Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ resignation after he was revealed to have had encounters with Russian diplomats, photos and records show Dems also met with the same Russian ambassador to little fanfare.

In fact, the Russian ambassador whom Sessions is accused of meeting visited the Obama administration White House no less than 20 times and even sat with Democrats at Trump’s congressional address Tuesday.

 Photos from earlier this week show Russia’s US ambassador Sergey Kislyak preparing to sit among democrats at the president’s first address to Congress.

Fox News reports that seven other Democrat senators also previously met with Kislyak, one of whom had claimed she had never met with any Russian ambassadors during her time on the Armed Services Committee.

From CRN Politics 

From CRN Politics

 The mainstream media has been feigning outrage over Trump jokingly urging the Russians to find Hillary Clinton's 33,000 deleted emails which allegedly concern weddings, Yoga, recipes, and messaging from Bill Clinton, who doesn't even use email.

But, they are apparently forgetting about Obama's hot mic exchange with Putin apparatchik Medvedev, in a meeting in Korea, as featured at the beginning of this article. 

Obama and Medvedev were discussing the de-armament of America in a highly conspiratorial tone, and yet the media, at the time, didn't seem to have a problem with it.

So, why would they have a problem now over Hillary's lawyer-deleted emails which concerned recipes, Yoga, and weddings?

And then, there's the reset button Where Hillary reset the Cold War with the Russians (Read Further)

But, that's not important, it was funny maybe even a joke, and yet, despite Obama continually striking a conciliatory aspect with the Russians, they still invaded the Crimea in Ukraine.

But, most folks don't actually know the full story behind that.

Obama, as a slightly younger Senator, actually enabled the later Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2005, when he led the operation in actually disarming Ukraine, making the Russian invasion possible.

Obama inspecting his handiwork in 2005

According to the UK Daily Mail, Obama's enablement of Russia's invasion went this way:

"As a U.S. senator, Barack Obama won $48 million in federal funding to help Ukraine destroy thousands of tons of guns and ammunition – weapons which are now unavailable to the Ukrainian army as it faces down Russian President Vladimir Putin during his invasion of Crimea.

In August 2005, just seven months after his swearing-in, Obama traveled to Donetsk in Eastern Ukraine with then-Indiana Republican Senator Dick Lugar, touring a conventional weapons site.

The two met in Kiev with President Victor Yushchenko, making the case that an existing Cooperative Threat Reduction Program covering the destruction of nuclear weapons should be expanded to include artillery, small arms, anti-aircraft weapons, and conventional ammunition of all kinds.

After a stopover in London, the senators returned to Washington and declared that the U.S. should devote funds to speed up the destruction of more than 400,000 small arms, 1,000 anti-aircraft missiles, and more than 15,000 tons of ammunition."

Could the Russian invasion have gotten any more convenient without the August actions of Senator Obama?

And finally,  there's that little fact about Hillary Clinton, via the US State Department, who acted on behalf of the Russians to lay claim to a substantial amount of America's uranium, used for making nuclear bombs.

According to the New York Times, it was Hillary Clinton, after receiving massive cash donations from Russia, who enabled the ownership of a company, controlled by Russia, which handled a substantial portion of America's uranium deposits:

"The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife,Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. 

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show."

The irony wrapped within an enigma, in all of this, is the fact that the US media seems to have forgotten all of these Manchurian candidate moments when it comes to Obama and his protege', Hillary Clinton, who are attacking Trump While trying to characterize the GOP  nominee as a lesser Manchurian candidate.

It would appear that someone's forgetting an awful lot of history....