October 20th, 2016
October 11th, 2016
Youtube, joining in on the Clinton side, de-listed a major Trump ad focusing on the dangers of Hillary Clinton….I think that’s about enough
By Barry Secrest
A political hurricane has erupted after Trump’s clear victory over Hillary Clinton, in Sunday night’s debate.
There have been continually clear signs of collusion between the establishment media, the establishment political class, and even the Obama DOJ.
Charges that the full force of the US Government, under Obama’s corrupt direction, has been colluding with Clinton campaign officials on matters from A-Z , have been zig-zagging around the internet all day.
Meanwhile, after Hillary’s initial attack on Trump, Sunday night, Trump has decided to remove the gloves and go after Hillary Clinton in the way he indicates that he always wanted to do, in the first place.
At 4:00am on October 11th, Trump issued a tweet stating the following:
“It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America the way I want to.”
According to Fox News icon, Bill O’Reilly, three major mainstream media organizations have distributed an internal command to all if its employees, to destroy Donald Trump.
However,the Media’s 800 LB gorilla, the Drudge Report, has begun a powerful counterattack against both the mainstream media and Hillary Clinton, in an effort to effectively balance the scales, posting story after story referencing thousands of Wikileaks hacks, and character accounts that the media won’t touch, any one of which could ultimately destroy Hillary Clinton.
Indeed, it’s been a media orgy out there with the occasional establishment Republican proxy joining in to bend over just a little more deeply for Progressive penetration, in what amounts to less than nothing, as it concerns Donald Trump.
In the modern-day of “Fifty Shades of Grey” and non-stop Kardashian vulgarities, the media’s activities of late, amount to nothing much more than the equivalent of dry-humping a frayed Trump-in-effigy pinata, that’s no longer holding together very well.
In fact, all indications point to the fact that the American people aren’t buying it, especially when that same media waxes disdainful of traditional American’s sensibilities on all things considered of a truly perversive nature.
Now, when the obscenities flow like Bohemian wine, with the media only intensifying its deranged velocity–that same media has suddenly developed a hive-mind of victorian sensibilities based upon onerously flagrant remarks built around the act of kissing?
So, should we, the America people, now tell our rather naive journalist-puppies the truth or just let them keep humping, perhaps throwing them the occasional pillow when their well-frayed Trump facsimiles finally fall apart?
In truth, while the media looks for every microscopic splinter in Trump’s tough hide, they somehow consistently fail to see Hillary’s stick-built towering wicker-man stuffed full of campaign body-bags, only to be burned a full 9 days after Halloween, on November the 9th.
This assumes, by the way, that everything goes just swimmingly for Hillary and her media, on the day just before.
Clearly, the media conspiracy that everyone’s in on, allows for a mainstream release of some extraneous bit of flotsamic dressing on Trump, only when the real, truly damaging information, on Hillary, comes out from both Wikileaks and DC Leaks, like Clockwork
Let’s take a look.
On Friday, when Wikileaks released damaging info from her Goldman Sachs speeches hacked from campaign point man John Podesta, almost within the hour, the entire media let forth with Trump’s statements from about 11 years ago.
Now, what are the odds?
The leaks spoke to the fact that in many campaign speeches, Clinton has viciously attacked Trump’s plan to lower Corporate taxes, however, in her hacked Goldman Sachs speech excerpts‘Clinton praised the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan — which would reduce corporate tax rates,’ which goes against every Clinton statement uttered throughout her campaign.
Also disclosed, by Wikileaks, was the fact that Clinton, in reality, is pro-TPP politically, despite her public utterances to the contrary; she only meaningfully changed her position on the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) since she began running for president while attacking Trump for being against the current US trade policy , giving everything away to foreign US competitors creating massive trade imbalances, for America, totaling into the trillions.
The Wikileaks revelations also revealed thatClinton admits to lying publically about her actual views.
In fact, Hillary admits in her speeches that “you need both a public and a private position”which folds right into Trump’s assertions that virtually everything out of Hillary Clinton’s mouth is a lie, uttered only for political effect.
During the debate, Hillary actually laid the blame for her statement of holding dual positions for political effect, on none other than Abraham Lincoln, reaching back over 150 years to assign blame to the man who freed the slaves, and who was, of course, a Republican, which obviously makes it okay.
In addition, while the media pushes Trump’s splinters for their epic Skyfall production, they have ongoingly ignored, comparatively speaking, one of the most damning historical facts in Hillary’s lengthening rap sheet.
As a defense attorney in Arkansas, when Clinton still had her law license, Hillary was caught on tape laughing off the life-damage done by a 41-year-old child molester and rapist, whom she defended in a court of law, for his attack on a young girl.
Hillary laughed about the fact, on tape, that she managed to get her client off, who was confirmed as having had the 12-year-old rape victim’s blood mixed in his underwear along with semen.
Hillary stated that “she lost faith in polygraphs after her client passed his polygraph test” while fondly speaking about the entire debacle with excited mirth.
Hillary, the self-described “champion of women and children,” actually attacked the young 12-year-old rape victim as having come from a dysfunctional family, and as a girl who fantasized about having sex with older men, after the girl was lured into the assailant’s car, on a lonely road, only to then be beaten and raped.
She described the 12-year-old child victim, before the court, as suffering from severe psychological problems to the point of wanting attention from men due to her dysfunctional family. In essence, she blamed a 12-year-old girl for rape rather than then the men who perpetrated the heinous crime.
In retrospect, It was almost as if Hillary was practicing Shariah compliance, in blaming the woman or child, rather than the men, even well before such things became cool to the political establishment, in the modern day.
The media has remained, comparatively,as silent as a church mouse with regard to the entire incident.
And then there are the body bags, not just those from Libya,or Egypt, or Syria, that Clinton orchestrated on behalf of her globalist exploits, rather, those here at home too, which few within the conventional media ever dare to talk about, at least not anymore.
It’s all out political war, in America, right now, and the next thing to expect is an all-out American backlash against a severely co-opted mainstream media that continually fails to identify its bias, unlike the alt media.
However, If you don’t like what the media is doing, you can send a clear message by immediately canceling your biased newspaper subscription, because, in fact, with the Drudge Report still operating, you don’t really need it anyway.
You can stop watching all major network nightly news, including biased networks such as CNN & MSNBC.
Nielson will soon be registering your disregard, along with advertisers, besides, between Fox and many other more valid outlets, you will probably be more in the know, anyway.
Stay away from retailers that strongly espouse progressives values, there are plenty of non-biased political businesses still in operation, throughout America.
There are also plenty of news media shows, also, to patronize, like Lou Dobbs, on Fox Business, Hannity on Fox, and of course Rush Limbaugh on AM radio, and let’s not forget the increasingly popular Alex Jones, who offers windows into what’s happening, that will truthfully shock many Americans as well as international citizens.
They’ve sent us a strong message; now, it’s time to send them one right back ladies, and gentlemen, and hit em’ right where it hurts.
October 8th, 2016
By Barry Secrest
Hillary Clinton continuously campaigns on her role as a champion of women and children.
But, is she really?
Back in the eighties, when Clinton still had her law license, Hillary was caught on tape laughing off the life-damage done by a 41-year-old child molester and rapist, whom she defended in a court of law, for his attack on a young girl.
Hillary laughed about the fact that she managed to practically get her client off, who was confirmed as having had the 12-year-old rape victim's blood mixed in his underwear along with semen.
He served only two months in jail.
Hillary stated that "she lost faith in polygraphs after her client passed his polygraph test" while fondly speaking about the entire debacle with excited mirth.
But, it wasn't just that.
Hillary actually attacked the young 12-year-old rape victim as having come from a dysfunctional family, and as a girl who fantasized about having sex with older men, after the girl was lured into the assailant's car, on a lonely road, only to then be beaten and raped.
Hillary spoke of the girl as if she suffered from severe psychological problems, as being reasons for the terrible crime perpetrated against the young girl, and by a violent pedophile.
Hillary got her client off with only two months in jail, and once again, she laughed about it.
With all of Hillary's problems and there are a great many, along with her checkered past in public service in the US government, isn't it odd that the US media has nothing to say or report about Hillary's bizarre response to these facts, as being a laughing matter?
The victim states that her life was ruined, she was beaten into a coma for five days and emerged with injuries that would never heal.
So, now, when she hears Hillary talk about herself as being a champion of women and children, Kathy Shelton, the grown-up victim of the demonic attack, still carrying the pain and the consequences, can only painfully laugh in response.
Hillary will deny the story, and the media will strike to her defense, but we have Hillary on tape recalling these exact facts about the crime, and we also have the victim's testimony.
October 4th, 2016
By Barry Secrest
A backlash caused by the globalist agenda of forcing 3rd world Islamic refugees, among others, into the Western world, in addition to an effort by these same leaders to redistribute wealth from the West to 3rd world nations, has global elites worried.
They're calling it a "populist uprising" which seems to suggest that the elites consider themselves to be in some form of control or at least as authorities over the masses, rather than the voting citizens of various western democracies, who, at least to the elites, must be mimicking only an illusion towards self-government.
Quite telling, indeed.
The globalists' singular agenda of erasing borders across the west, against the increasingly concerted will of the people, has grown to be nothing short of a real-life conspiracy, that both the media and the powers that control them have forever tried to hide.
To that end, the multicultural fascists, making up those who consider themselves the elite, are preparing now to gather in Washington DC, for a discussion on alternative strategies.
It seems the elites, who primarily fancy Marxist-Socialist constructs, are finally running out of other people's money even as their Keynesian economies continue a slow but steady swirl down the drain of questionable intent.
The Elite appear to be implicitly blaming a disdain for free trade, across the planet, for the impasse, and yet free trade is not all the problem, rather, it's the globalists' actions of hitching all sorts of sovereignty-surrendering straps to the current crop of trade agreements, being made in secret,without input from the people's representatives, all across the planet.
They're also blaming Donald Trump as the conservative patriotic frontman newly leading the free world's cause.
The globalist actions of trying to smash nations together while erasing all collective borders, smacks of an acceleration of something approaching a one-world construct being engineered, secretly, by way of freak-trade agreements, that in fact offer only minimal actionable clauses, when it comes to actual trade.
Their efforts appear to swaddle trade in the clothing of totalitarian fascism while hoping their patriotic opponents lack the mental veracity to catch on.
Meanwhile, an increasingly sophisticated western citizenry, stretching from Europe to the Americas, have grown ever more weary of an agenda being foisted upon the West by men like international henchman-financier, George Soros, who ostensibly leads the weak-kneed multiculturalists.
However, the game appears to be up for the globalists, except for a range of dynamics that the Luciferian financiers may yet try to advantage.
Chiefly, Russia and China, as opposed to both America and Europe, are increasingly pounding the war drums, making for the possibility of an unthinkable solution being bandied about by the military-industrialist elites, soon to gather.
Uncharacteristically, at least when it comes to nations that can hit back hard, the Obama regime and the establishment political class appear to be responding in kind, for a change. Meanwhile, the American people remain still, more often mystified than not, on why war with Russia over Syria, a nation with little strategic value, remains so important to both the US and the global masters directing the overall agenda.
War, in fact, might be their overall solution, prefaced upon building back up their portfolios with a harvesting of weapons sales, increased security, and death; it's what they ultimately live for.
The main part of this story comes to us from Bloomberg:
"Policy-making elites converge on Washington this week for meetings that epitomize a faith in globalization that’s at odds with the growing backlash against the inequities it creates.
From Britain’s vote to leave the European Union to Donald Trump’s championing of “America First,” pressures are mounting to roll back the economic integration that has been a hallmark of gatherings of the IMF and World Bank for more than 70 years.
Fed by stagnant wages and diminishing job security, the populist uprising threatens to depress a world economy that International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde says is already “weak and fragile.”
The calls for less integration and more trade barriers also pose risks for elevated financial markets that remain susceptible to sudden swings in investor sentiment, as underscored by recent jitters over Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG’s financial health.
“The backlash against globalization is manifesting itself in increased nationalistic sentiment, against the outside world and in favor of increasing isolation,” said Louis Kuijs, head of Asia economics at Oxford Economics in Hong Kong and a former IMF official. “If we lose consensus on what kind of a world we want to have, the world will probably be worse off.”
In its latest World Economic Outlook released Tuesday, the fund highlighted the threats from the anti-trade movement to an already subdued global expansion. After growth of 3.2 percent in 2015, the world economy’s expansion will slow to 3.1 percent this year before rebounding to 3.4 percent in 2017, according to the report, keeping those estimates unchanged from July projections. The forecasts for U.S. growth were cut to 1.6 percent this year and 2.2 percent in 2017.
“We’d like to see an end to the creeping protectionism in the world and more progress on moving ahead with free-trade agreements and other trade-creating measures,” Maurice Obstfeld, director of the IMF’s research department, said in a Bloomberg Television interview with Tom Keene.
Lagarde said last week that policy makers attending the Oct. 7-9 annual meeting of the IMF and World Bank have two tasks. First, do no harm, which above all means resisting the temptation to throw up protectionist barriers to trade. And second, take action to boost lackluster global growth and make it more inclusive.
Achieving even those modest objectives may prove elusive.
Free trade has become polling poison in the U.S. presidential campaign, with Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton now criticizing a trade deal with Pacific nations, which isn’t yet ratified in the U.S., that she had praised when it was being negotiated. Republican challenger Trump has lashed out at Mexico and China, threatening to slap big tariffs on imports from both nations.
Rattled by the U.K.’s June vote to leave the EU, European leaders know it may just be the start of a political earthquake that’s threatening the continent’s old certainties. Next year sees elections in Germany and France, the euro area’s two largest economies, and in the Netherlands. In all three countries, anti-establishment forces are gaining ground.
With growing resentment of the EU from Budapest to Madrid, policy makers have described the current surge in populism as the greatest threat to the bloc since its creation out of the ashes of World War II.
Perhaps the biggest beneficiary of free trade over the past generation, China, still restricts access to many of its key industries, with economists worried about increasingly mercantilist policies. It’s also seeking a larger role in the existing global framework, with entry of the yuan into the IMF’s basket of reserve currencies on Oct. 1 the most recent example.
An all-out trade war would be a disaster for China’s economy, with Trump’s threatened tariff potentially wiping off almost 5 percent of its gross domestic product, according to a calculation by Daiwa Capital Markets.
John Williamson, whose Washington Consensus of open trade and deregulation was effectively the governing ethos for the IMF and World Bank for decades, said the 2008-09 financial meltdown had undercut support for economic integration.
“There was agreement on globalization before the crisis and that’s one thing that’s been lost since the financial crisis,” said Williamson, a former senior fellow at Peterson Institute for International Economics who is now retired.
The growing opposition to economic integration has been fueled by a sub-par global recovery.
“Perhaps the most striking macroeconomic fact about advanced economies today is how anemic demand remains in the face of zero interest rates,” former IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard wrote last week in a policy brief for the Peterson Institute.
The world economy is getting some lift after rising at an annual rate just shy of 3 percent in the first half of this year, according to David Hensley, director of global economics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York.
But much of the boost will come from a lessening of drags rather than from a big burst of fresh growth, said Peter Hooper, chief economist at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York and a former Federal Reserve official.
Recessions in Brazil and Russia are set to come to an end, while in the U.S. cutbacks in inventories and in oil and gas drilling will wane.
“I’m characterizing the global economy as something akin to a driverless car that’s stuck in the slow lane,” said David Stockton, a former Fed official and now chief economist at consultants LH Meyer Inc. “Everybody feels like they’re being taken for a ride but they’re pretty nervous because they can’t see anybody in control.”