January 23rd, 2016
'Difficult to live as a Jew in France'
January 18th, 2016
“Two Corinthians, right?” he said. “Two Corinthians 3:17. That’s the whole ballgame.”
The verse reads: “Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.”
January 18th, 2016
According to the Book of Genisis, the world was destroyed because of human wickedness or “impurity,” as the word is directly translated.
Impurity, in the more controversial sense, however, also speaks to the mixture of human and angelic DNA in the form of offspring, spawning what are referred to as the mighty Nephilim beings, which were largely purged from the Earth during the great flood.
Now, the limits of science are being tested again, ala Plum Island, a now closed US bio-research facility which fused what have been stated to be numerous genetic experiments with diverse DNA.
The only difference being, now, higher institutes of learning are performing these experiments and this time, with human & animal DNA, together….
By Anjana Ahuja
The Chimera was a zoological monstrosity of Greek myth: a fire-breathing beast with the head of a lion, the body of a goat and a serpent for a tail. It was vanquished by Bellerophon, who dropped lead into the creature’s mouth, inducing molten suffocation.
Scientists are now breathing life into the concept of chimeras by creating organisms containing the cells of humans and animals.
Several teams in the US are inserting human tissue into early pig and sheep embryos. The journal MIT Technology Review estimates that 20 such hybrid embryos have been produced, an early proof-of-principle step towards growing human organs inside animal tissue.
The hybrid embryos have been observed in early development but, crucially, are never brought to term. The Salk Institute in California, together with the universities of Stanford and Minnesota, are among the institutions pioneering the as-yet-unpublished research.
The purpose of chimera research is not to bring “manimals” to life, as Dr Moreau did on the island imagined by HG Wells.
Instead, non-human embryos can be thought of as Petri dishes in which the development of human tissue can be observed. They may also allow the cultivation of human tissue, such as hearts, livers and kidneys. Nurturing human organs inside pigs and sheep is one possible solution to the worldwide shortage of organs available for transplantation. Growing them from a patient’s own cells may also mean a lower risk of rejection.
In fact, chimera research has a long history. For decades, newborn mice have been “humanised” by the insertion of human liver cells and immune cells to render them more biologically analogous to humans during drug testing .
Now “pluripotent” human cells are being inserted into early animal embryos: these are cells feted for their ability to blossom into virtually any cell, and very early animal embryos are able to integrate them more easily.
When the NIH stopped funding such research , citing concerns that those human cells could flower into neurons and reproductive tissue, its stance was underpinned by the spectre of cross-species horrors: first, a non-human animal with human consciousness (possibly motivated by a 2014 paper suggesting mice become smarter when human cells are put inside their brains); second, the chance of a human embryo gestating inside another species.
These are scenarios that exist only in science fiction, according to academics. Private funds have enabled American research to continue legally (chimera research is also legal in the UK, provided labs have a licence and embryos are destroyed after 14 days). One source is the private California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, set up by the state to enable controversial biological research to continue whatever the political climate.
And this climate, in fact, may be the key to the conservatism displayed by the NIH, which echoes restrictions placed on stem cell research in the US during the last Bush administration. Fusing human and animal cells to make human organs may be seen by some on the religious right as an affront to human dignity. There are also animal welfare considerations.
On the other hand, some 123,000 Americans are waiting for organ transplants, a shortage that costs lives and fuels the sordid business of transplant tourism. Neither of which does much for human dignity, either.
The writer is a science commentator
January 13th, 2016
Controversial author Barry Secrest and exo-government specialist Lee Daniel as they discuss an ever-expanding caseload of governmental issues, oddities, politics, Biblical prophecy & The New World Order--all from an entertaining, cutting edge, Conservative perspective.
Hillary Clinton Email Discusses US State Department Plot to Incite Palestinian Unrest Against Israel
January 8th, 2016
Last night during the State of the Union address, President Obama refused to acknowledge that Islamic extremism is even "a thing."
Instead, he said the greatest threat facing America is climate change.
~ Todd Starnes, Fox News, on 1/21/15
By Barry Secrest
Many Americans are now beginning to both believe and even affirm that Conservative opponents of Obama, who were sounding the alarm bells back in 2008, were definitively correct in their assertions and for very good reason.
The President's authoritarian actions have placed him into political isolation across a score of policy fronts while defenders have dropped back into wildly ridiculous counter-arguments to make Obama's actions seem both reasonable and justified when in fact they are anything but.
In point of fact, the NSA is monitoring every single move of every American via their phones, computers and even travels, while ignoring the threat from hundreds of thousands of Illegals pouring over the border, some certainly hostile, should give every single American thoughtful pause regardless of political leaning, and yet, it apparently does not.
Also, a recent report from the Bureau of Labor & Statistics detailed that fact that since the year 2,000 virtually all of the 5.7 million new jobs created in that period went to either legal or illegal aliens, leaving natural born Americans out in the cold. Yet, Obama mocks and insults his concerned opposition for not fulfilling his desires, while simultaneously ignoring their constituent issues, and then blaming them for intransigence, calling it gridlock. The President then routinely threatens an executive bypass of voter representatives in Congress, while a seemingly vacuous pseudo-media claps and begs for more.
Objectifying onlookers might view these manifestations as being not the actions of a concerned President, but rather symptomatic of an underlying disorder commonly associated with pathological narcissism as complicated by a tendency towards authoritarianism.
Top Down, Bottom Up, Inside Out
However, it's Obama's actions about the Mideast and Islamic Extremism, which now has many concerned foreign policy experts wondering what could possibly be next, from the President.
Obama's promise to 'stand with them' (the Muslims) has seemed to have taken full flight even as the winds have certainly shifted into an ugly political direction, but it's also which brand of Islamic extremism that Obama seems to be supporting that has many alarmed.
Indeed, in February of 2011, National Director of Intelligence James Clapper appeared before a US intelligence committee and iterated to everyone in attendance that one of the primary players in the Egyptian Revolution, the Muslim Brotherhood, was a "secular group dedicated to non-violence."
It was only a few months later and after the Brotherhood took over that the Muslim Brotherhood began crucifying, hanging and beheading Egyptian Christians at an unprecedented rate.
Although largely forgotten now, we can obviously see that Clapper's testimony was not one of fact, but rather reflected an erroneous worldview which both Obama and his Regime wants America to see, in abeyance to a totally differing truth that they would rather keep hidden.
This hidden worldview by America's leadership, in fact, speaks to what both could and should be defined as a clear and present danger to America and its future. However, Obama's polished theatrical skills in concert with the warped optics reflected by a largely co-opted media leave many, not a little dazed if not completely confused as to the President's overall agenda.
Moreover, we can see this phenomenon by meaningfully noting what the President has done, in responding to each Mideast event, as opposed to what the President has obtusely stated, before his overall reaction by noting the penultimate response and the hindmost outcome. While the President seems to have been finally if not reluctantly dragged to a war-party footing of stopping the spread of ISIS, Obama has instituted what could be termed mini-pin prick attacks designed to irritate the enemy, at best and anger his Generals, at worst.
Further, the President has sought to intensify now the arming of the same radical Islamic element of Syrian rebel fighters, who eventually became the ISIS -caliphate state, in the first place.
While Obama has consistently proffered the open hand of friendship towards America's avowed enemies within most if not all of the Islamic world, the President has chillingly shunned America's Israeli allies in the Mideast.
Recently Obama stunningly halted shipments of US Hellfire missiles to Israel even while arming and funding the same Al Qaeda rebels in Syria who eventually broke off and became the brutal Caliphate building terrorist group known as ISIS.
This because the deadly terrorist group Al Qaeda could supposedly no longer accept ISIS' radical extremist views if one can imagine that. Nor are Obama's true feelings concerning Israel's Jewish President a big secret when an open mic incident in late 2011 caught Obama bemoaning the fact that he had to deal with the Israeli leader on a daily basis.
In fact, even while the terrorist organization, Hamas, was lobbing rockets into Israel from Palestine, the US President continually scolded and even warned Israel for firing back and counter-attacking the bloodthirsty Islamic group in a clearly defensive posture, prompting many to ask exactly whose side Obama was on.
During the HAMAS missile firing conflict with Israel, a transcript of a heated conversation between Obama and Israel President Netanyahu was released in 'The Times of Israel' which was subsequently translated into English, and published in the Wall Street Journal, as follows:
Barack Obama: I demand that Israel agrees to an immediate, unilateral ceasefire and halt all offensive activities, in particular airstrikes.
Benjamin Netanyahu: And what will Israel receive in exchange for a ceasefire?
BO: I believe that Hamas will cease its rocket fire — silence will be met with silence.
BN: Hamas broke all five previous ceasefires. It’s a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel.
BO: I repeat and expect Israel to stop all its military activities unilaterally. The pictures of destruction in Gaza distance the world from Israel’s position.
BN: Kerry’s proposal was completely unrealistic and gives Hamas military and diplomatic advantages.
BO: Within a week of the end of Israel’s military activities, Qatar and Turkey will begin negotiations with Hamas based on the 2012 understandings, including Israel’s commitment to removing the siege and restrictions on Gaza.
BN: Qatar and Turkey are the biggest supporters of Hamas. It’s impossible to rely on them to be fair mediators.
BO: I trust Qatar and Turkey. Israel is not in the position that it can choose its mediators.
BN: I protest because Hamas can continue to launch rockets and use tunnels for terror attacks –
BO: (interrupting Netanyahu) The ball’s in Israel’s court, and it must end all its military activities.
The question that should be asked might center on whether or not the President also had such a conversation with HAMAS leadership, which started the conflict in the first place.
So, is the President siding with America's most passionately avowed enemies or America's greatest ally? Perhaps the answer lies partially within the fact that in February 2014, before the ISIS rampage, Obama actually referred to the medievally inclined terrorist group invading Iraq as a "JV team."
In truth, Obama's insidious attitude towards the nation of Israel has recently instituted a modern-day "Exodus" from the Democrat party by some Jewish US citizens, according to recent reports. In fact, Obama even stated the following as an exclamation point to these rather telling facts:
“Because Israel is so capable militarily, I don’t worry about Israel’s survival,”~ Barack H. Obama
However, the penultimate slap in the face by the Obama Regime against Israel occurred when Secretary of State John Kerry sided with two of Israel's greatest opponents, the nations of Turkey and Qatar, which both fund and back Hamas, in order to broker a cease-fire with Israel at Egypt's original behest and an event that the Washington Post described, as follows:
"By turning to Turkey and Qatar, Kerry also enhanced their position in the regional power game. That’s contrary to the interests and desires of the United States’ traditional allies, such as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the moderate Palestinian camp headed by Abbas."
Either way, despite the vast majority of Americans who support Israel, Obama's allegiance against the consent of the governed in America has increasingly inclined towards siding with Islamic terrorist states as opposed to democratically elected non-Islamist allies of the US.
The question is why?
The issue seemed to have begun in earnest when Obama sought to topple Presidential dictator Hosni Mubarak's peace-keeping authoritarian regime in Egypt, in apparent favor of a Muslim Brotherhood takeover. Egypt is populated primarily by Sunni Muslims, which are the same Islamic sects that comprise the terrorist group ISIS or ISIL, which, once again, is overtaking Iraq.
Not by coincidence, the Muslim Brotherhood is also comprised of Muslims belonging to the Sunni sect of Islam, as does Wahhabism or Salafism, both forms of ultra-extremist Islamism.
After Sunni leader Mohamed Morsi took over Egypt as President and promptly suspended the constitution, the Islamists came out in full force and through Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood followers, began a form of religious cleansing which include killing and crucifying of Christians all over Egypt, eventually causing the Egyptian military to step in and take over due largely to populous demands.
During the same period of Morsi's reign of terror, Obama had finalized an agreement in which F-16 fighters, tanks, and billions of dollars in funding was being sent over by the US. When the Egyptian military finally took over the government, Obama promptly halted both the transfer of aid and arms.
So, the first question one might begin asking could be centered upon whether or not a declaration of martial law is acceptable to Obama. The next question might be that if martial law is acceptable-- then why is a martial law takeover, by the military at the behest of the governed, then somehow not? In essence, "what difference at this point does it make?"
Of note is the now buried fact that the Obama Regime actually facilitated the overthrow of Western ally Mubarak, for the western hating Muslim Brotherhood. According to an article which appeared in the UK Telegraph on January 28, 2011, agents of the US Government were fully engaged in the overthrow of the Mubarak Regime.
"The American Embassy in Cairo helped a young dissident attend a US-sponsored summit for activists in New York while working to keep his identity secret from Egyptian state police."
"On his return to Cairo in December 2008, the activist told US diplomats that an alliance of opposition groups had drawn up a plan to overthrow President Hosni Mubarak and install a democratic government in 2011."
So, it would appear that the Obama Regime was at the very least culpable in the destabilization of one of America's and Israel's most stable Mideast allies.
With the nation of Egypt now economically and culturally in tatters, one wonders if the Egyptians are enduringly appreciative of Obama's brand of "Change We Can Believe In?"
Or perhaps stolen democratic elections and regular democratic elections are apparently viewed as one and the same in Obama's increasingly warped Acorn-inspired viewpoint. Either way, Obama seemed to come down squarely in support of an Islamic extremist takeover of Egypt and if not for Egypt's military, would have achieved just that.
In essence, Obama supported the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt which by the way, is primarily Sunni Muslim, against the secular military's recapture of the government to restore full order and put an end to the religious cleansing.
Despite Obama's consistent promises about red lines and chemical weapons when it came to Syria, Obama's desire to immediately attack and bring down Bashar al Assad's autocratic government, was stifled by political pressure leveled by none other than the American people from all sides of the political perspective.
It was after a hotly contested chemical attack in Syria when Obama came under withering fire from most of the world due to his much earlier remarks on the theoretical use of chemical weapons there, and his militaristic answer:
“We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”
Some time after the attack occurred, Obama began posturing for an attack in Syria and in the face of none other than Russia.
However, at the same time, Obama's war-footing began, most if not all of America stood up and let loose a withering stream of invective concerning Obama's insertion of America into a civil war where America holds no true interests.
Even worse, there seemed to be no lesser evil involved in this conflict due simply to the fact that Obama and America by default, would have been supporting a bloodthirsty pack of Islamic terrorist rebels over a non-Islamic dictatorship.
While many pundits felt that the Syrian rebels were mostly moderate, other experts were adamant that, in fact, there were no good guys to side with concerning the Syrian conflict. However, Obama seemed to be clearly inclined to back the Christian-killing Sunni Islamic rebels over a Christian-protecting Syrian dictatorship.
So, Obama supports the Sunni Islamic Extremists against Syrian government leadership that is composed primarily of Alawite's, a sect of Shia Islam....
The plot thickens.
During the Islamist-inspired Arab Spring uprising in Libya, Obama eventually provided NATO airstrike support in routing Libyan forces that ultimately led to the brutal killing of Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi. In fact, stories even then began surfacing which spoke to the fact that Al Qaeda both was and still is a significant part of the rebel fighting forces in Libya. However, these facts seemed more to spur Obama on for an ultimate takedown of each government, which ultimately resulted in each becoming extraordinarily destabilized, to this day.
Meanwhile, as with virtually every other nation being overrun by brutal Islamic factions bent upon the genocidal extinction of both Christians and other faiths, Obama after the fact has completely ignored these countries. It's almost as if Obama's entire mission in the Mideast has been built upon the complete and continued destabilization of each nation while Islamic extremism descends upon of these countries turning them into pockets of virtual hell on Earth.
Muammar Gadhafi, the dictator who was ultimately attacked and deposed by NATO under Obama's leadership, was a follower of Islamic Quranism, which traditionally rejects all forms of Sunnism and Sharia law.
A quantifiable pattern begins to emerge.
The Complex Question of Obama and Iran
While the Arab Spring took firm hold in the Mideast and then started to take root in Iran, Obama became uncharacteristically silent. With Obama's either verbal or direct support of Sunni overthrows in virtually every Mideast destabilization agenda, Obama was surprisingly mute during the Iranian Green Revolution of 2009, the question becomes, why?
Iran is primarily Shia in its Islamic adherence thereby breaking the Sunni pattern established thus far--or does it?
The one thing to remember is that Iran, unlike each of the other government takedowns, is headed by a theocratic government system of Mullahs and dominated by Sharia law.
The other key element to note is the fact that Iran's cultural submersion in Islam and the fact that it is non-Arab, marks a significant threshold between it and other Mideast government topplings. Also, Iran has been noted to be at the core of a wide number of varied Islamic militant groups including HAMAS, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad organizations.
In addition, according to the American Univeristy in Cairo: "Since its inception, the Islamic Republic has calculated that the Arab street would ultimately overthrow pro-American dictatorships and the balance of forces that favored Israel. Iran's long-term regional security calculation has thus been predicated on championing the Arab street and rejecting any engagement with Washington designed to rehabilitate Iran as a compliant U.S. ally."
A meaningful answer, to be certain, in addressing the overall question, but as to the other side of the equation, there is another dynamic at play concerning the Obama Regime's worldview of Iran.
According to Mideast expert, historian, and Professor Emeritus Bernard Lewis, "In a sense, Iranian Islam is the second advent of Islam itself, a new Islam sometimes referred to as Islam-i Ajam. It was this Persian Islam, rather than the original Arab Islam, that was brought to new areas and new peoples: to the Turks, first in Central Asia and then in the Middle East in the country that came to be called Turkey, and India."
Ultimately, what is difficult for many Western Christians to understand, is the fact that "As Islam was diffused into the Turkic world through Persian[Iranian] Sufi influences (both on Sunni & Shia Islam), it sought to establish a commonality of belief with the indigenous [Islamic] religious practices," --and there you have the simplest of answers to the most complex of questions, the perfect ingredient in establishing the penultimate goal of an all-encompassing Mideast Caliphate.
Also, having Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett as the President's Chief of Staff probably doesn't hurt very much either.
So, while Iran is primarily Shia in its Islamic views, the Persian (non-Arab) Iranians represent a relatively newer form of Islam which seeks to unite all of Islam via Sufi influences, which therefore seems to speak to Obama's overall solicitude regarding all things Iran.
With all of the facts surrounding Obama's hasty retreat from Shia-dominated Iraq, where the US actually established what should have been a pipe dream for Obama (that being a Democracy established by Islamic adherents) instead Obama shunned a status of forces agreement and bolted all American Troops for the door.
This allowed ISIS, which is nothing much than a slightly bloodier version of Al Qaeda, to establish itself as the preeminent power in Iraq. The primary Obama reaction of note might be the very thing that ties a pretty bow upon the entirety of this article, from US News and World Report:
"Obama blamed the Iraqi government, led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, for unfairly stacking the security leadership with Shiite Muslims and shutting out the Sunni minority, which accounts for about a third of the population."
"We can't do it for them," Obama said. "This should be a wake-up call."
Once again, Obama seems far too put out over the exclusion of Sunni's from a particular government equation and blames the Iraqi Prime Minister for the brutal savagery of ISIS Sunni Terrorists.
So, as we can see in virtually each Mideast case, Obama's worldview seems to dangerously assert the more radical Sunni or Sufi Islamist worldview which is the very thing that's essential for the eventual Super-Caliphate which both could and would terrorize the modern world, with a special emphasis on the entirety of Christendom and the West.
Obama's Muslim Brotherhood Cabinet
The next question, about which branch of Islam Obama is most partial to, should naturally center upon some rather questionable additions to the President's White House Staff.
There are thousands of stories posted on the internet about these radical staff members, but the question naturally becomes, are these stories even true?
-First on the list is Arif Alikhan, who has been serving in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) since 2006. Alikhan was later elevated to the position of Professor of Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, in 2010, by Obama.
Alikhan is a devout Sunni Muslim.
-Next up is Mohamed Magid, who as a naturalized citizen, immigrated to the United States from the Sudan in 1987. Magid is President of the Islamic Society of North America and was added to Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2011.
Magid studied Islam under African Sunni scholars, one of which being his own father, the Grand Mufti of Sudan, making Magid a Sunni Muslim.
-Third on our list is Mohammed Elibiary, an advisor to Obama's Homeland Security Staff since 2010 and a radical Islamist Cleric whose militant stance regarding Islam in America, has made him a veritable pariah among high-info Conservative journalists across the US. Elibiary recently got into a Twitter fight online, when he tweeted "America is an Islamic country," and then, rather than refuse to apologize for the obvious error, he compounded on his rant.
While Elibiary's list of offenses against American tradition an,d even perhaps law, are both long and versatile, his bio is rather suspiciously difficult to lock down. However, while Elibiary is noted to be an admirer of the murderous Shiite Ayatollah Khomeini, he lists the father of modern Islamic fundamentalism, Sayyem Qutb, as a major inspiration and a positive political influence on his life, which every American should read. This, in addition to Elibiary's many and varied connections with the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood, would place Elibiary squarely within the Sunni Muslim camp of jihadist belief systems.
Elibiary was forced to resign from the White House even as this article was being written, largely due to his extremist Islamic viewpoints threatening to reveal Obama's Islamist world view.
-Next, on Obama's Islamist list of advisers is none other than Rashad Hussain, who was named as both Deputy of Obama's counsel in 2009 and also as a special envoy to the President's Organization of the Islamic Conference in 2010.
Interestingly, Hussain, who was born in Wyoming in 1978 to US naturalized migrants from India, is a recipient of the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans, which was founded by, and named after, George Soros's older brother and sister-in-law.
While Hussain may be considered as one of the more "moderate" members of Obama's Islamist advisers, Hussain's constantly surfacing political connections within the US seem to consistently orbit around Muslim Brotherhood activists, which would tentatively place him within the Sunni group of Islamists.
-Our fifth Obama advising Islamist, Salam al-Marayati, is the founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which is a group based out of LA created for the defense of Islamic extremists and violent offenders. al-Marayeti is both a Hamas and Hezbollah sympathizer and outwardly despises the nation of Israel. al-Marayati was born in Baghdad, Iraq and migrated to the US at age four. He is also married to Doctor and Islamic Muslim Women's League activist Laila Al-Marayati, a Sunni Muslim, who hails from Palestine.
Extraordinarily outspoken and active, al-Marayati, was named as Obama's representative of the U.S. government at the annual Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe human-rights conference. A frequent and repeat defender of Palestine and Hamas, each of which are considered Sunni Islam organizations, in addition to his Sunni Triangle roots, prominent in Baghdad, most likely places al-Marayeti in the Sunni camp of Islamists.
-Finally, on Obama's Islamist leadership positioning is a man named Eboo Patel, who serves on Obama's inaugural Advisory Council concerning Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships. Patel, who describes forced out of government communist Van Jones as an “American patriot,” and a true giant of history, was born and raised in Illinois of parents who emigrated from Mumbai, India.
Patel, according to Discover the Networks, enjoys ties to former Leftist Terrorist "Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, in addition to Islamists Rashid Khalidi, Mumia Abu-Jamal, and Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf." Patel was also listed on the American Society of Muslim Advancement website as a "top Muslim leader of tomorrow."
Patel states of his illogically rampant American disillusionment: “I was kind of taught the same myths about America, a land of freedom and equality and justice, et cetera, et cetera,” a thing he was taught differently under Bill Ayers, who finds America to be essentially void of any true justice. Patel's Islamic identification stems from his parents belief system, that being Ismailism, which is a branch of Shiite Islam. Even more interestingly, while espousing an inter-faith impetus globally, Patel individually seems to believe in his own familial traditions with Shia Islam, despite taking a Sunni Muslim for wife. Patel even quotes T.S. Eliot, in specific abeyance to his dishonoring of American tradition, writing, "A tradition is not simply inherited; It is something acquired only by great labor." Patel would inarguably, be the sole member who falls under the Shiite form of Islam.
Aside from Obama's treatment of various Mideast countries undergoing Islamization, there are then the admittedly bizarre references to Islam, which Obama has made continuously over the prior six years. To be sure, Obama seems to have become the world of Islam's most ardent defender right next to now almost forgotten 'Nation of Islam' leader Louis Farrakhan, who must be under a gag order judging from his overall retreat from the front pages of US media.
As recently as September 2014, Obama has made several rather stunning remarks while addressing both the nation and the UN, regarding the terrorist group ISIS and Islam.
"Now let's make two things clear ISIL is not Islamic"~Barack Obama, 9/11/14
"We face a more lethal and ideological form of terrorists who have perverted one of the world's great religions."
The interesting thing concerning Obama and his many flowery references to Islam, we could find no instance of Obama having ever referred to Christianity or Judaism, among many others, as one of the world's great religions.
Obama, who has serially used, and even attacked, the Protestant Bible to make a case for his social agenda, seems to have come out in an almost bizarre and continuous defense of Islam, throughout his Presidency. Even while the President is in the process of being sued by the Catholic Church for ignoring their Constitutional right to freedom from Governmental interference, he has simultaneously praised virtually any and every facet of Islam, to the point of even languaging any references to Islamic terrorism, by removing the "Islamic" out of the explanation.
From the Washington Times: The White House's official policy of banning the word "Islam" in describing America's terrorist enemies is in direct conflict with the U.S. military's war-fighting doctrine now guiding commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan.
John O. Brennan, President Obama's chief national security adviser for counter-terrorism, delivered a major policy address on defining the enemy. He laid out theWhite House policy of detaching any reference to Islam when referring to terrorists, be it al Qaeda, the Taliban or any other group.
So, why such a terrible need to "defend" Mr. President?
The final mystery, however, is at the end of a particular video, where in a perfect dialect, Obama tells the people of Turkey that he is one of them. We know that Obama is not Turkish, so then what exactly did he mean?
Perhaps the true issue is one of wondering why Obama feels the need to hide his true beliefs from the American people and one particularly alarming question that none appears to want to answer.
In Kenya, where most of Obama's siblings currently live, the Predominant form of Islam being practiced is Sunni Islam. In fact, in 2009, a rather strange story was published at The Daily Nation in which the Church of Mormon tried fervently to convert Obama's Grandmother, Mama Sarah Obama, from Muslim to Mormon. The effort was almost successful, however, at the last moment, family members prevailed and stopped her from converting.
"Attempts to convert US President Barack Obama’s grandmother to Christianity flopped on Saturday at the 11th hour after family members opposed the move."
"Although Mama Sarah Obama had dressed up for the day, her son, Saidi Obama, and other family members were adamant that she would not attend a baptism ceremony organized by the Seventh Day Adventist Church (SDA)."
However, the ties don't end there.
Even Obama's stepfather, Lolo Soetoro was also a Sunni Islamist in Indonesia, where virtually the entire nation observes Sunni Islam as its most prevalent form of religion, which according to our findings, is the Islamic group with which Obama most consistently identifies, both in action and words and apparent allegiance.
Among all religious groups, Muslims gave Obama the highest approval rating, at 72 percent, meanwhile, shortly after an Islamist beheaded a Christian lady in Oklahoma, the White House Sent an actual Thank You' note to the Beheader's Oklahoma Mosque Congregation.
While simultaneously soft-attacking Christianity in America for the past six years of his Presidency, Obama in an interview originally aired with French Canal Plus News, on June 1st, 2009, wrongly indicated that America is 'one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.'
This action could be accredited to Obama's consistent Presidential acts of "taqiyya"--a term, defined as a tacit and accepted "act of lying or concealment on behalf of Islam."
Obama, in the 2009 interview, went on to state "we have to educate ourselves more effectively in Islam," which apparently is a veiled attempt at evangelizing Islam as widely as possible across America by the increasingly embattled Islamist-oriented President.
"Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation"~ Barack Obama, 6/28/06
According to Pew Research, when comparing various Muslim populations across the world in what is referred to as a "weighted map," the US barely even appears as being visually identifiable, in a Muslim population comparative graphic.
Additionally, Wikipedia states that the US is actually ranked at 38th, concerning Muslim population comparisons.
Conversely to Obama's rhetoric, America does, in fact, house the world's largest Christian population, and by far, with well over two-thirds of its population identifying as believers of Jesus Christ.
According to the highly sourced and referenced website Wallbuilders, Obama's anti-infidel approach towards all things "non-Islamic" seems more globally "anti-Biblical" rather than "merely" anti-Christian:
"Perhaps the most accurate description of his antipathy toward Catholics, Protestants, religious Jews, and the Jewish nation would be to characterize him as anti-Biblical. When Obama's hostility toward Biblical people of faith is contrasted with his preferential treatment of Muslims and Muslim nations, it further strengthens the accuracy of the anti-Biblical descriptor. In fact, there have been numerous clearly documented times when his pro-Islam positions have been the cause of his anti-Biblical actions.
Obama Plans To Fight-Back Against US Media's Anti-Jihad Articles For 'Safety' of US Soldiers (Islam)
Moreover, numerous websites include extensive case- lists of example after example of actual instances rather than mere rhetoric, owing to Obama's shall we say increasingly "anti-Christ" stance about all things Judeo-Christian.
It was evil Nazi Adolph Hitler who stated of Islam and the predominant Protestant religion of Germany, at the time:
"The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"
After Paris, many Americans are now wondering if perhaps Obama's constant defense and even praise of Islam, and his conspicuous absence in the recent Paris stand against Islamic extremism by world leaders, might have something more to do with ideology than mere political correctness.
When it comes to Christianity, Islam, and Obama, there are other parallels, which bear notice and simply cannot be refuted.
In a June 2006 speech Obama mocked the Christian Bible, by stating the following:
"Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy?" Obama asked in the speech. "Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount? "
We have thoughtfully included a Youtube video, for those who might doubt the veracity of the above quote.
So, it would seem that these two leaders do undeniably, have at least something of note in common.
In fact, Hitler went on to even glorify Islam:
"The world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -Then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult that glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so. "
The fact as stated by the evil Nazi leader, that Christianity blocked his [Hitler's] takeover of the world, would seem to conflict directly with Hitler's erroneous contention on the subject.
However, while Hitler was quick to praise Islam, did not Obama, in effect, do the same thing in these quotations?
“The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”
“The prettiest sound on Earth” is the Muslim call to prayer at sunset. "
“These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”
These are, but a few of a large number of Obama quotes on Islam.
So, while many within the politically correct realm may react in horror at the comparisons between these two Socialist leaders who're viewed as worlds apart, the comparative points are certainly there, especially when we look at historical US Presidential views between Christianity and Islam.
Nor has it been lost on many informed Americans when Obama, initially in his regime, sought to criminalize via a seriously flawed report, much if not most of his political opposition titled:
The redacted report sought to warn America of the dangers posed by same-sex marriage critics, pro-lifers, and even groups concerned with adhering to the U.S. Constitution, among many others.
Moreover, in a report by the Daily Caller, the Department of Homeland Security “has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, and takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists.”
“In a checklist entitled “Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don’ts,” the DHS’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of government “legitimate.”
Moreover, traditional America’s opposition is automatically invalidated while Islamic opposition bears serious consideration. This, even as the President and his regime has continually sought to downplay Islamic extremism and the dangers it poses to America.
Most Americans had no idea that Obama’s “Transformation of America” would seem to include the downplay of traditional American values for Islamist preferences. Obama has never been willing to call out Islamic extremism, in example after example, however, it's not just the extremism aspect that quells the regime, it's the unwillingness to acknowledge Islamic involvement, which has been seen in repeated instances from both this President and his top officials.
Extreme, one can see, is within the eye of the beholder and Obama views Americans which hold both Constitutional and Christian principles of pro-life and pro-gun rights as purely extremist views in opposition to his own, while exhibiting tacit approval regarding 'exculpatory' examples of Islamic extremism.
Finally, much has been made of Obama's acumen with regard to his formative rise at Harvard law school and Obama's so-called expertise with regard to the US Constitution, however, what many do not know is the presence of an actual inscription on Harvard's' ' Wall of Justice, ' which is located on the entrance wall to the school.
“O ye who believe!
Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses
To Allah, even as againstYourselves, or your parents,
Or your kin, and whether
It be (against) rich or poor:
For Allah can best protect both.”
The passage is Scripture taken directly from Islams' holy book featured on the Harvard wall, and it's appropriately enough, at this transformatively Progressive school.
Mountains of Evidence
Unfortunately, in the reams of evidence we came across in accumulating this article, much had to be thrown out, however, not because of the sagacity of the material, but rather because the article could have easily taken up the space required of a very long book.
We decided to include a large number of lesser-known facts, and derivations in that vein, rather than those which are already commonly populating websites all over Christendom, and beyond.
In conclusion, while Obama [may] not be the infamous "anti-Christ" so often mentioned in the Holy Bible, he'll certainly do quite keenly until the real thing arrives, it would seem.
Obama's actions are parenthetically directed towards the assimilation of both Sunni Islam's culture and its practices gradually into America, along with a large number of its radicals, apparently, both in thought and in deed, and Obama will defend the basic tenets of Islam and its diaspora, no matter the penultimate consequences, to us all.
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth," ~
Seven days after publishing this article Obama seems to try a repudiation of our question:
Refocus Reports 1/21/15: Obama Thinks Climate Greater Threat than Muslim Extremism, Gray State Death, A-10 Warthog vs. ISIS