March 29th, 2017
Isn't it fascinating that the Progressives who tend to love Islam, as the PC police, forced a billboard down in Asheville because it Stated that "sometimes, it's okay to throw rocks at girls."
According to thousands of news articles from the Mideast, is an essential pastime of brutal Islamic thugs, who tend to view women as property.
However, we all know what the semi-clever jeweler actually meant....
Asheville, by the way, located in western North Carolina, has become known to the rest of the state as a very progressive town, over the past several years...
~ Refocus Notes
By Beth Walton
ASHEVILLE - The internet is ready to rumble with a local jewelry store for a controversial billboard that went up Monday with the phrase, "Sometimes, it's ok to throw rocks at girls..."
Several posts attacking the Spicer Greene Jewelers' advertisement off Patton Avenue near Interstate 240 appeared on the popular Facebook group WAX, West Asheville Exchange.
One, made by Shannon Page on Wednesday evening, generated 160 responses and 228 comments in less than 24 hours.
"Their sexist billboards have always annoyed me, but this one is horrifying," she wrote. "Not cool. Normalizing and finding humor in the, 'He hit you because he likes you' mentality that we feed to children is not ok.
"Small steps like this lead to a culture of violence against women. Also, children will not see the humor in this billboard. All they will see is, 'It's ok to throw rocks at girls.'"
Page told the online group of nearly 28,000 members that she works with kids and doesn't want them exposed to this type of message. She said the youths were confused and offended Wednesday morning. "It broke my heart to explain to them why it was 'funny.'"
The business posted an apology to its Facebook page just after 2 p.m. Thursday. "We did not intend to cause controversy and our billboard communicated something we did not intend," it said.
March 23rd, 2017
Bending over backwards to appease followers of Islam only serves to embolden radical Islamists, a former Muslim said on Tucker Carlson Tonight following a terror attack in London Wednesday....
By Adan Salazar
Women’s rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali explained Islamists aren’t concerned with whether a society accepts their culture or not.
“I think that if you look at the Islamists they don’t go to the liberals and say, ‘Thank you so much for letting us, you know, take over. We’ll stop terrorizing you.’ They don’t do it,” Ali argued.
“So what you’re saying is the Islamists don’t want sensitivity above all, that’s not their goal?” Carlson followed up.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Ali, the founder of the AHA Foundation which defends critics of Islam, answered that the Islamists’ ultimate goal is to create a global “Sharia compliant” society no matter the cost.
“The Islamists want one thing and that is a Sharia compliant society and eventually the world. That’s what their aim is. It sounds crazy to you and me and everyone else, but that’s their objective.”
Ali also described the infrastructure by which Islam takes over a culture, including indoctrination, intimidation and physical violence known as “jihad.”
“And whoever is in their way is their enemy,” Ali said.
“And it doesn’t matter how nice the liberals are, how accommodating and obliging they are, that’s the objective of the Islamists. And if you don’t understand that I don’t think you should be in the business of making legislation or in the business of authority leadership because you are just incapable of understanding that problem.”
The former Dutch parliamentarian also claimed nations which welcome the culture aren’t perceived positively by Islamists; rather, the religion sees cultural integration as the work of God, and outright rejects the ideas of non-Muslims.
“They remind us that we don’t have that moral standing because the Islamist sees non-Muslims and non-Muslim ideas and even non-Islamist ideas as illegitimate, as against the idea of God. And I think we empower them because every time we appease and appease and appease, they see that as – you know they see God’s hand, their perception of God – they see God’s hand as making it easier for them to advance their agenda.”
In the interview, Ali also voiced her support for President Trump’s executive order which temporarily bans travel from six terror-prone nations.
Ali’s foundation website describes her as “someone who is not afraid to speak out when she feels it necessary.”
March 22nd, 2017
"Anti-Globalist Gamechanger: What just happened in the UK Will now empower Trump's agenda, here in the US, unlike ever before, BANK on it"....
"How Does Wearing a work/bathrobe create the effect of making an unelected politician believe they're above criticism while walking on water?"
"FROM NOW ON: Trump should refer to the TRAVEL BAN as a "People who want to Kill Americans" ban --WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE AT THIS POINT?"
Listen live and CALL IN to speak to the host and co-host–(347) 996-3923.
Join the conversation!
Despite Best Efforts of Media, Political Establishment & Shadow Government Trump Pulls Back to 50% Approval
FBI Director Comey Refuses to Answer Trey Gowdy's Question on Whether Or Not Obama Briefed on Michael Flynn's Calls (Youtube)
FBI Ignoring Top Clinton Campaign Associate John Podesta's Collusion with Multiple Russian Government's State-Run Companies
Islamic-Style Multi-staged Terrorist Attack on British Parliament: Pedestrians Run Over & Knife Attack Puts UK On Edge (Youtube)
Confusion Over Identity Of London Terrorism Suspect, As Previously Named Abu Izzadeen Is Still In Prison
Nations Receive Hundreds of Millions in US Foreign Aid Despite Refusal to Take Back Citizens in US Illegally
MUZZLED: Breitbart WH Correspondent Ordered Not To Ask Televised Question Discrediting DNC Russian Hacking Story
Why Estimates of Immigration Influx Are Completely Wrong: Nearly 1/4th of US Public School Students Live in Immigrant Households
March 22nd, 2017
This event will be an Anti-Globalist Gamechanger.....
Parliament in lockdown: Police open fire outside Westminster and shoot knife-wielding man amid reports of explosion and 'at least 12 pedestrians mowed down on bridge'
- Several shots have been fired at the House of Commons in Westminster
- At least three people have been hit and emergency teams are on the scene
- Reports also suggest a car plowed into pedestrians on Westminster Bridge
- The Prime Minister has been evacuated and staff told to stay inside
Armed Police have opened fire and shot an intruder inside the grounds of the Houses of Parliament amid reports a car drove into pedestrians on Westminster Bridge.
An intruder with a knife managed to break into the grounds of Parliament and stabbed a police officer before he was shot, reports suggest.
More than 10 people are said to have been hit by a car on Westminster Bridge after a vehicle described as a '4x4' reportedly drove into pedestrians and cyclists.
Three bodies were visible on the floor outside Parliament and the Palace was placed on an immediate lock down.
Prime Minister Theresa May is said to have been bundled into a car by a plain-clothes police officer and driven quickly from the scene.
It is thought a lone attacker drove the vehicle across Westminster Bridge before crashing into a fence at the Houses of Parliament and getting into the grounds.
The House of Commons was suspended by Deputy Speaker Lindsay Hoyle. MPs have been ordered to wait inside the Commons chamber.
People outside the palace could be seen running from the scene when the shots were heard.
A man with a knife was seen within the confines of the palace.
An eye witness said that a car was seen to mow down five people on Westminster Bridge.
March 13th, 2017
USA TODAY NETWORK - Tennessee
By Joel Ebert
Tennessee became the first state in the nation on Monday to sue the federal government over refugee resettlement on the grounds of the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of several state lawmakers Monday morning in the western district of Tennessee, contends that the federal government has violated the Tenth Amendment, which says the federal government possesses only the powers delegated to it by the U.S. Constitution and that all other powers are reserved for the states.
The charge that the federal government is not complying with the Refugee Act of 1980, based on the Tenth Amendment, makes Tennessee’s lawsuit the first of its kind. Other states have sued the federal government over refugee resettlement but on different legal grounds.
The nation continues to debate refugee resettlement and immigrant rights as it awaits President Donald Trump’s new travel ban. The ban, set to take affect Thursday, bars travel for many people from six Muslim-majority counties and is considered by Trump’s opponents to function essentially as a Muslim ban, although the administration denies this charge.
The lawsuit argues that the federal government has unduly forced states to pay for the refugee resettlement program. The federal refugee act was designed to create a permanent procedure for the admission of refugees into the United States.
The lawsuit asks the court to force the federal government to stop resettling refugees in Tennessee until all costs associated with the settlement are incurred by the federal government.
“Plaintiffs will suffer significant and irreparable harm unless this Court intervenes,” the 15-page lawsuit states.
The defendants named in the lawsuit include the U.S. Department of State, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Refugee Resettlement.